View Full Version : Battle Rankings
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 05:04
I was thinking we should start a thread and have a ranking system of everyone who has played in head to head battles and their rank. I need help on how certain things work but this is what I got so far...
Rank:------------------------ Wins.........Loses
Evil_the_Cat.... -------------- 1................0 <----- SIG GOD
Voice Of A Riot --------------- 1................0 <----- SIG GOD
Tribunal.......... -------------- 10...............3
Legend Killer....... ------------ 7...............4
Coolio................. ------------ 3................1
MiNiMaL_sAnItY.. ------------ 2................3
The House......... ------------- 1................1
Soldier One....... ------------- 3................5
Undecided......... ------------- 3................6
Skribble............ -------------- 0................1
Boomheadshot45 ----------- 0................2
Skribble
06-27-2006, 05:18
I'm currently in 2 battles, but I think they are my first 2, so I have no record. Good idea btw.
Tribunal
06-27-2006, 05:20
Skribble you were my second win. I mean, you've battled me before.
Skribble
06-27-2006, 05:28
I have? Owhell, thats Wins 0 - Losses 1 then. I don't remember that loss, maybe I can just forget it :lol:
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 05:35
ok...I updated it
UndecideD
06-27-2006, 15:08
Im like 3 and 6 lmao don't even put me up there.
The House
06-27-2006, 15:39
I think I am 1-1.
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 19:49
okay....its updated....just post in here if things change so i can update it.
Currently Evil the Cat is undefeated, so he would be the one to challenge.
Supaman²²³
06-27-2006, 20:10
Add me too im 0 - 1 and currently waiting from a reply from Undecided or anyone else that want to battle me
soldier one
06-27-2006, 20:11
Skribble you were my second win. I mean, you've battled me before.
i was your first loss lol we havent battled after that. :D
i dont know my record probably horrible though like 3 and 5 or something.
I don't think it should work like that though.
Maybe a points system based on how close the battles were?
3 points for a win of more than 10 votes.
2 points for a win of more than 5 votes and
1 point for a win of 3 points or below. If you lose you get nothing?
Would that not make it fairer since if you won your first battle you could just stop after that and be ranked the best even if you were terrible!
Tribunal
06-27-2006, 20:55
Skribble you were my second win. I mean, you've battled me before.
i was your first loss lol we havent battled after that. :D
i dont know my record probably horrible though like 3 and 5 or something.
I beat you the first time, and I beat you the second time. Granted the second time was only by 1. But I did it. Legend Killer was my first loss.
I don't think it should work like that though.
Maybe a points system based on how close the battles were?
3 points for a win of more than 10 votes.
2 points for a win of more than 5 votes and
1 point for a win of 3 points or below. If you lose you get nothing?
Would that not make it fairer since if you won your first battle you could just stop after that and be ranked the best even if you were terrible!
That wouldn't work. With all of NUM buddies that come out of no where and vote he'd be past everyone in no time.
J/k. :lol:
soldier one
06-27-2006, 21:11
^wait your right it was undecided that i beat.
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 21:23
That wouldn't work. With all of NUM buddies that come out of no where and vote he'd be past everyone in no time.
J/k.
lol...yep, me and my possie :lol: :lol:
:lol: So would there be any other method for keeping newbies out the top spot?
(Granted some noobs are amazing but noobs that have just been lucky)
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 21:37
lol, yep. We should come up with a fair ranking system though...
Anyway, for now lets just ahve wins and losses and I will try and put them in order the best way I can.
soldier one
06-27-2006, 22:22
lol, yep. We should come up with a fair ranking system though...
Anyway, for now lets just ahve wins and losses and I will try and put them in order the best way I can.
do it like hockey, a win is 2 points, a tie is 1 point, and a loss is no points. that way one win dont make you number one.
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 22:33
ok that soujnds alright then....that way the more contests you enter the better...although...what if though...you had like 32 wins but 300 losses....would you still be #1???
Thats why I think you should get negative points for losing that way losses hurt you.
soldier one
06-27-2006, 22:37
ok that soujnds alright then....that way the more contests you enter the better...although...what if though...you had like 32 wins but 300 losses....would you still be #1???
Thats why I think you should get negative points for losing that way losses hurt you.
ok how about 2 points fora win, 1 tie, and -1 for a loss?
or you can do some average thing but wont work with the probelem we are trying to fix.
Tribunal
06-27-2006, 22:40
Yeah, a loss should count against you.
JustinPinter
06-27-2006, 22:46
ok that soujnds alright then....that way the more contests you enter the better...although...what if though...you had like 32 wins but 300 losses....would you still be #1???
Thats why I think you should get negative points for losing that way losses hurt you.
ok how about 2 points fora win, 1 tie, and -1 for a loss?
or you can do some average thing but wont work with the probelem we are trying to fix.
Sounds good except there are no ties.
Tribunal
06-27-2006, 23:01
There can be some ties.
I think there has been like... 5 battles where someone wins by 1 so a Tie can happen.
Voice Of A Riot
06-27-2006, 23:11
Add me up there to NUM I've won a grand total of 1 battle (against Svetlana) and lost 0. Yep that's right, I've been battling hard :roll:
Evil_the_Cat
06-27-2006, 23:19
Evil_the_Cat.... -------------- 1................0 <----- SIG GOD
Huh, SIG GOD? 8)
Now how am I supposed to live up to that...
Supaman²²³
06-28-2006, 01:03
Add Me too my record is 0-1 do it NOW :lol: :lol:
soldier one
06-28-2006, 01:18
Sounds good except there are no ties.
well sometimes guys set a time at which it ends and you never know what will happen so i thought mine as well be prepaid right.
Isn't it kind of rigged that people with only ONE win and no loss is considered "first"?
A better system should be devised, like "Win - Loss = Total Rank Point".
Supaman²²³
06-28-2006, 01:40
Isn't it kind of rigged that people with only ONE win and no loss is considered "first"?
A better system should be devised, like "Win - Loss = Total Rank Point".Yea i agree, a good system would be the losses minus the Wins is your score.
So then you can have a negative score.
soldier one
06-28-2006, 01:45
Isn't it kind of rigged that people with only ONE win and no loss is considered "first"?
A better system should be devised, like "Win - Loss = Total Rank Point".
thats what mine does. 3 wins = 6 points and 3 loses = -3 total 3 points so that way a person with one win only has 2 points.
im thinking mabe a win should be 3 points instead.
MiNiMaL_sAnItY
06-28-2006, 01:47
:shock: Wow i'm on the list! :shock:
Supaman²²³
06-28-2006, 01:49
alright lets keep it simple, 1 win = 1 point, 1 loss = -1 point, ties = 0 points,
alright lets keep it simple, 1 win = 1 point, 1 loss = -1 point, ties = 0 points, Yes indeed, lets...
Besides, using a complicated extrapolation system would give the higher ranked members and unfair advantage because a "loss" would hurt them less than a newer member (or at least a member with fewer wins).
soldier one
06-28-2006, 01:58
alright lets keep it simple, 1 win = 1 point, 1 loss = -1 point, ties = 0 points,
it wont work, say you have 4 wins and 4 losses then you have no points, now your behind the person that only battled once and happened to win. but two point wins you would have 4 points and the one battle would only be 2.
Supaman²²³
06-28-2006, 02:01
alright lets keep it simple, 1 win = 1 point, 1 loss = -1 point, ties = 0 points,
it wont work, say you have 4 wins and 4 losses then you have no points, now your behind the person that only battled once and happened to win. but two point wins you would have 4 points and the one battle would only be 2.It may seem like at the begining but it will take about5-competion from everyone so this methode work accurtly because it will keep thingseven other wise you will have Tribunal with like 500 points while Legen killer is has 5 points
Tribunal
06-28-2006, 02:04
If we did Soilder way I would be at 17 points. With a record of 10-3, and Legend Killer would be at 10 points with a record of 7-4.
If we did it the other way around. I would be at 7 points, and legend killer would be at 3.
At first they both look bad.
Supaman²²³
06-28-2006, 02:10
If we did Soilder way I would be at 17 points. With a record of 10-3, and Legend Killer would be at 10 points with a record of 7-4.
If we did it the other way around. I would be at 7 points, and legend killer would be at 3.
At first they both look bad.My thread had a bit of pun it but i see your point
Tribunal
06-28-2006, 02:14
Well I can tell that lol. Wasn't quite a pun as much as it was an exaggeration. But I just thought I'd use the example.
soldier one
06-28-2006, 02:17
yes of course its going to look abd but when you think about it 7 points is only really a couple wins away. but in the long run i think have multiple points for a win would work alot better than a single point.
Why are we doing this? :|
Thorzilla
06-28-2006, 04:00
Hey NUM, i had a battle not long ago against brett. Could you please update the firs post please thank you!
Thor 1 Win, 0 Loses= 8)
IM PROUD OF YOU SPAIN!
Isn't it kind of rigged that people with only ONE win and no loss is considered "first"?
A better system should be devised, like "Win - Loss = Total Rank Point".
thats what mine does. 3 wins = 6 points and 3 loses = -3 total 3 points so that way a person with one win only has 2 points.
im thinking mabe a win should be 3 points instead.
Yes, like in football (Or as you say soccer)