View Full Version : PS Move in different levels of Light
BlacJack
09-03-2010, 04:36
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAu2jhJbr-E
Very good stress testing video for the Move.
Oh it worked because he didn't go outside at noon! I call shenanigans!
Ghost-Rhayne
09-05-2010, 13:37
:shock: Wow you can use the Move in diverse lighting conditions and while sitting down! Amazinggg!
:shock: Wow you can use the Move in diverse lighting conditions and while sitting down! Amazinggg!
Whats this sitting down you speak of? xD
Good video, shows Move to be very well designed.
Offtopic but why do loads of Move threads have to be turned into some pathetic stab at a rival product?
I reckon there should be a single manufacturer versus thread on the forum where people can do this to their little heart's content. Everywhere else, it's outlawed. Lol.
VintageElise
09-05-2010, 14:46
I loved his "With this supernova behind me" comments.
BlacJack
09-05-2010, 15:12
I laughed when he said "As my sunglasses melt over my face." lol
http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php?t=240380
posted already
Good
Offtopic but why do loads of Move threads have to be turned into some pathetic stab at a rival product?
same reason someone post videos of move not doing so well and they get deleted or no replies. Cause move can do no wrong(and really how funny would it be if when its released its faults finally come to light)
YoungMullah88
09-05-2010, 21:26
loving the sarcastic remarks thats been going around lately....the ones in the GT section are funny!!
and an ultimate versus thread has been requested before but....not gonna happen, people are too uptight in this forums
Galvanise_
09-05-2010, 22:01
same reason someone post videos of move not doing so well and they get deleted or no replies. Cause move can do no wrong(and really how funny would it be if when its released its faults finally come to light)
Prove it. I can assure you, there has been no Move threads deleted unless they have turned into a giant Kinect Vs Move thread and have had a lot of infractable posts. Unfortunately for the haters, Move actually works as advertised. Engadget, Digital Foundry, Kotaku, MSNBC, 1up, Eurogamer etc all rate it highly. Its had praise heaped on it.
Prove it. I can assure you, there has been no Move threads deleted unless they have turned into a giant Kinect Vs Move thread and have had a lot of infractable posts. Unfortunately for people like you, Move actually works as advertised. Engadget, Digital Foundry, Kotaku, MSNBC, 1up, Eurogamer etc all rate it highly. Its had praise heaped on it.
yeh cause i totaly flame move and always said how bad it is. go find a post of me saying that. People like me wow, dude your so funny cause we all know i bash products on here right?
Galvanise_
09-05-2010, 22:07
yeh cause i totaly flame move and always said how bad it is. go find a post of me saying that. People like me wow, dude your so funny cause we all know i bash products on here right?
I edited my post because it did seem a tad harsh, but your comment made it sound like the MOD's had actively been covering up these 'faults' Move has. We haven't. It works.
I edited my post because it did seem a tad harsh, but your comment made it sound like the MOD's had actively been covering up these 'faults' Move has. We haven't. It works.
first if a thread has been deleted how can i prove it if it no longer exist? Seconed I only used that to try to even it out instead of pointing at one thing so people wouldnt get all uptight, tho i guess I failed in that point.
Galvanise_
09-05-2010, 22:18
first if a thread has been deleted how can i prove it if it no longer exist? Seconed I only used that to try to even it out instead of pointing at one thing so people wouldnt get all uptight, tho i guess I failed in that point.
We don't stealth delete threads. They are reported and if the content of peoples posts is against the rules or if its dragged off topic too much, we will close it. We don't close threads to cover up inconvenient truths. For example if a thread was made about how rubbish Killzone 3's current bounding box (which is rubbish at this stage) is for Move was posted. . .that wouldn't be deleted.
You don't need to even anything out. Just let things go with the flow. I'm not uptight at all. If anything I feel quite bad for the people who still think Move doesn't work when the people who have played it and the tech orientated websites seem to love it.
So, buying Move? I've got two Move's and two Navigation controllers on Pre-order. The adjusting LED's and adjusting light saturation of the Eye really is an ingenious way to account for a wide range of light conditions. As these videos show, you effectively have to be living on the sun to muck up the tracking.
We don't stealth delete threads. They are reported and if the content of peoples posts is against the rules or if its dragged off topic too much, we will close it. We don't close threads to cover up inconvenient truths. For example if a thread was made about how rubbish Killzone 3's current bounding box (which is rubbish at this stage) is for Move was posted. . .that wouldn't be deleted.
You don't need to even anything out. Just let things go with the flow. I'm not uptight at all. If anything I feel quite bad for the people who still think Move doesn't work when the people who have played it and the tech orientated websites seem to love it.
So, buying Move? I've got two Move's and two Navigation controllers on Pre-order. The adjusting LED's and adjusting light saturation of the Eye really is an ingenious way to account for a wide range of light conditions. As these videos show, you effectively have to be living on the sun to muck up the tracking.
Only thing that can hold the move up is it being to acurate if you wanna call it a bad thing. From how hard you hit depends on how hard your char hit in the fight, to the swing power of your stroke in Tiger Woods. This will probably get alot of gamer mad at it(not to mention we may see some wii remote episodes with people saying thier move controler broke thier lamp, tv, etc cause they let it go by not using a strap) cause they probably wont be able to swing/hit that hard. People are gonna think "oh I have a wii" flairs arms wildly not relizing you have to the actual movements for 99% of the games.
Galvanise_
09-05-2010, 22:39
Only thing that can hold the move up is it being to acurate if you wanna call it a bad thing. From how hard you hit depends on how hard your char hit in the fight, to the swing power of your stroke in Tiger Woods. This will probably get alot of gamer mad at it(not to mention we may see some wii remote episodes with people saying thier move controler broke thier lamp, tv, etc cause they let it go by not using a strap) cause they probably wont be able to swing/hit that hard. People are gonna think "oh I have a wii" flairs arms wildly not relizing you have to the actual movements for 99% of the games.
Very true. I've already seen some videos of this where people think they can 'flick' their way through Sports Champions table tennis and have been puzzled in Tumble because they didn't realise they had to actually move their arm forward to get blocks through gaps. If the Wii hadn't have existed, all of this would make absolute sense to anyone. Why shouldn't I thrust my motion controller forward to pop balloons?
Move is intuitive, but people with Wii backgrounds will definitely be in for a shock. Its much more precise than WM+ too. This is a massive problem for marketing. On the surface a lot of the games look like they play like Wii games, when the reality is that they require much more involvement.
Very true. I've already seen some videos of this where people think they can 'flick' their way through Sports Champions table tennis and have been puzzled in Tumble because they didn't realise they had to actually move their arm forward to get blocks through gaps. If the Wii hadn't have existed, all of this would make absolute sense to anyone. Why shouldn't I thrust my motion controller forward to pop balloons?
Move is intuitive, but people with Wii backgrounds will definitely be in for a shock. Its much more precise than WM+ too. This is a massive problem for marketing. On the surface a lot of the games look like they play like Wii games, when the reality is that they require much more involvement.
ahh but if it wasent for the WII one could argue there would be no motion controls. Yes i know was in development, and the eye toy thing is ps2 technology(tho really who bought those games lol) but WII just brought it. I just want it for FPS. I mean coming from a mostly keyboard and mouse the few fps i played for wii I rocked. Even as bad as re5 was I would buy it agian for motion gun...not to mention we all want a new Time Crisis game.
Galvanise_
09-05-2010, 22:52
ahh but if it wasent for the WII one could argue there would be no motion controls.
True. Its just a shame that Nintendo didn't have a more precise solution to begin with. The first time I used a Wiimote, I was still feeling 'This is not accurate at all' and wasn't impressed by it.
^Exactly. I honestly thought it was going to be 1:1...didn't know about that stuff back then. Then once Motion + came around, I realized that it was never supposed to be 1:1...and well, it wasn't even after M+.
BlacJack
09-06-2010, 01:59
http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php?t=240380
posted already
Actually, mine was posted before yours, check the time stamp ;).