PDA

View Full Version : Worlds fastest supercomputers unveiled



Perfect Sin
11-11-2005, 03:15
The US National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has unveiled two new IBM supercomputers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), which are capable of the fastest processing speeds yet achieved.
The 65,536 processor BlueGene/L supercomputer has performed a record 280.6 trillion operations per second on the industry standard LINPACK benchmark - software used to rank the speeds of the world’s fastest machines.

Purple, the other half of the most powerful supercomputing twosome, is a machine capable of 100 trillion operations per second as it conducts simulations of a complete nuclear weapons performance.
Together, the Purple and BlueGene/L systems will perform half a petaflop, or half of a quadrillion (1,000,000,000,000,000) operations per second.
NNSA administrator Linton F Brooks said the machines will be used to run three-dimensional codes at lightning-fast speeds for nuclear weapons’ analysis. This was formerly accomplished by underground nuclear testing.
“The unprecedented computing power of these two supercomputers is more critical than ever to meet the time-urgent issues related to maintaining our nation’s aging nuclear stockpile without testing,” Brooks said.
“Purple represents the culmination of a 10-year effort to create a new class of supercomputers. BlueGene/L points the way to the future and the computing power we will need to improve our ability to predict the behaviour of the stockpile as it continues to age. This has reestablished American computing preeminence.”

In a recent demonstration of its work capability, BlueGene/L ran a record-setting materials science application at 101.5 teraflops sustained over seven hours on the machine’s 131,072 processors, running an application of importance to NNSA’s effort to ensure the safety and reliability of the nation’s nuclear deterrent. A teraflop is one trillion computer operations per second.
Both machines were developed through NNSA’s Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) program and join a series of other supercomputers at Sandia and Los Alamos national laboratories that are dedicated to NNSA’s Stockpile Stewardship effort to maintain the nation’s nuclear deterrent through science-based computation, theory and experiment.

Link: http://torrentspy.com/article.asp?id=3805


That is insane...Imagine playing games on that thing LOL! So much power.

hoverbike
11-11-2005, 04:43
I saw this and it just broke the record not to long ago. For gaming, it would be great for more characters on the screen at once but that needs other things too.

Perfect Sin
11-11-2005, 22:28
Hmmm sometimes i think they just make a record breaking super computer for no reason. Just to say HAH we have it.

pacman326
11-12-2005, 08:20
Just to say HAH we have it.


And that is why technology moves so fast these days, everyone is always one upping one another. That is one of the reasons why my 2 and a half year computer is coughing on some of the newer games, it just cant keep up. :(

udontneed2know
11-12-2005, 09:03
Yeah and notice it takes 65,000 processors to reach this mark.

And you don't even want to know the price of one of these things lol. Even a 2 year old supercomputer of the 18-40Tflop area would push you a cool 5 million bills.

The Chocobo Kid
11-12-2005, 21:14
Yeah and notice it takes 65,000 processors to reach this mark.

And you don't even want to know the price of one of these things lol. Even a 2 year old supercomputer of the 18-40Tflop area would push you a cool 5 million bills.I sure ten years from now. we can have that in are computers.

Pink
11-13-2005, 03:03
I would love to see the electricity bill for these things :lol:

pacman326
11-13-2005, 03:11
I would love to see the electricity bill for these things


Judging by energy costs in the States this year, the same as one family's usage for a month. :lol:

Aza
11-13-2005, 07:08
Ah another well spent large amount of money, I hope that computer gets used well.
I wonder how long till its out of date and needs replacing, perhaps a whole 2 day? :lol:

Perfect Sin
11-13-2005, 15:25
It makes me wonder what the heck they need all that power for...

Perfect Sin
11-13-2005, 15:27
It makes me wonder what the heck they need all that power for...

Hot*Topic
02-25-2008, 15:06
Notorious for banning Adult-rated games, the Australian Federal Government has made it public that they are considering an R-rating for videogames, roughly the equivalent of an 18-rating in the UK. This rating could finally allow the release of more adult titles in Australia.

At the present time the highest age restriction a game can receive is an MA-rating, which is essentially a 15+ rating, any game with a higher rating is refused classification. Gamers have been lobbying for the MA-rating to be expanded to videogames, as they have for movies, for several years, showing that a number of banned titles in Australia have been released elsewhere without trouble.

The move would assuredly come with some opposition especially from the Australian Family Association who believes that explicit videogamescan be more dangerous than films because of their interactivity.

"We're concerned about the level of violence and so on in R-rated material," said a spokesperson. "But in terms of the games, it seems that there's a lot more scope to actually change people's brain structure and their attitudes with games."

On the flipside, the Byron Report due to release toward the end of March in the UK, is expected to petition for a stronger ratings system for videogames backed by UK law.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=33456

The_Only
02-25-2008, 15:23
edited & live.

ps3 Wanna be
02-25-2008, 15:47
Hey Mike/Danny...I've changed the title of the article slightly on the site.

I don't want this to be patronising, so I apologise if it comes across as that lol.

But basically, it's not good English to split infinitives.

An infinitive, if you don't know, is a verb with no gender or tense...

e.g. to play, to run, or in this case...to create.

You're not supposed to put a word between "to" and "create".

So "to finally create" isn't so well written. If you wanted the word finally, it would have been better to say..."Australia finally creates..."

But I've simply changed it to "Australia to create..."

Hope that's ok!

The_Only
02-25-2008, 16:03
Of course its not patronising mate!

I should have changed this myself - I was a big rush to get on the phone and admittedly got a little sloppy.

Cheers mate. :)