<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>PSU Forums - Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.psu.com/forums/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Discuss the latest gaming & non-gaming related technological developments.]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:57:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>The smartphone thread (advice, support, etc.)</title>
			<link>http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/312277-The-smartphone-thread-%28advice-support-etc-%29?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:16:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The title explains itself. It's basically a smartphone talk thread. If you want to buy a smartphone, but you are overwhelmed with the choices, you can come here for advice. If there is something wrong with your phone, you can also seek help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The title explains itself. It's basically a smartphone talk thread. If you want to buy a smartphone, but you are overwhelmed with the choices, you can come here for advice. If there is something wrong with your phone, you can also seek help.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.psu.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/26-Technology">Technology</category>
			<dc:creator>Georges</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/312277-The-smartphone-thread-%28advice-support-etc-%29</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Having more laptop trouble, REP to anyone who helps</title>
			<link>http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/311332-Having-more-laptop-trouble-REP-to-anyone-who-helps?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm STILL having trouble with this laptop.

1. Ads. Ads are everywhere! They pop up randomly on both my browsers, IE and Firefox. They're extremely annoying because every single time I open a new window or go to a new page, the same ads or pop ups show up. I've scanned using malware byte and Windows Security Essentials. Both found nothing. How do I get these ads to go away?

2. Freezing. My laptop, on both browsers, freezes up frequently. It's the same for the other laptop in the house, which is my mother's older Toshiba. Our laptops are freezing up like crazy. Is it the internet connection? What is going on here?

REP to everyone who even TRIES to help me out!

Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm STILL having trouble with this laptop.<br />
<br />
1. Ads. Ads are everywhere! They pop up randomly on both my browsers, IE and Firefox. They're extremely annoying because every single time I open a new window or go to a new page, the same ads or pop ups show up. I've scanned using malware byte and Windows Security Essentials. Both found nothing. How do I get these ads to go away?<br />
<br />
2. Freezing. My laptop, on both browsers, freezes up frequently. It's the same for the other laptop in the house, which is my mother's older Toshiba. Our laptops are freezing up like crazy. Is it the internet connection? What is going on here?<br />
<br />
REP to everyone who even TRIES to help me out!<br />
<br />
Thank you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.psu.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/26-Technology">Technology</category>
			<dc:creator>The Black Wolf</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/311332-Having-more-laptop-trouble-REP-to-anyone-who-helps</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Canadian here: What are some cheap TVs that are still pretty decent?</title>
			<link>http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/311047-Canadian-here-What-are-some-cheap-TVs-that-are-still-pretty-decent?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 04:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As you may or may not recall, I made a post a few weeks ago about brightness flickering from high to low. Well a day or two after that post all my component inputs died, well now its effecting my composite (had to put my cable box on this for now) and HDMI inputs much worse than it did the Component ones.

I'm taking this as a sign that my TV is on the way out, so Ive been looking into possibly getting a new one. Called The Brick since I figured they would be able to suggest something, and the guy was trying to talk me into getting a Haier 42" 1080p LED TV (http://www1.thebrick.com/brickb2c/jsp/catalog/product.jsp?id=LE42F2280&navAction=jump&navCount=2). Wasn't sure if that would be as good as my current (Sony Bravia KDL-40S4100 (http://www.crutchfield.com/S-RXU43W2Hmft/p_15840S4100/Sony-KDL-40S4100.html#details-tab)) or not so I decided to shop around more.


Since this is the only forum I really go to I decided to come to you guys: Anyone have any suggestions for a decent TV thats at least as good as my current one, but wont cost me a lot?

I was hoping for a LED back-lit TV, with enough inputs to keep my set up (Composite: Wii, Component: Xbox 360, Cable box, HDMI: DVD player, PS3, and 1 spare) but it seems these days the new standard is two HDMI and one component, with most component inputs also using the composite video. I can at best fit a 42", assuming the frame is small, in my TV stand though I could possibly mod out the "shelf" a bit to fit a 46".

(I'd prefer if the side inputs were on the right instead of the left since the right is open, but the left side is the standard so thats not really a priority for me.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As you may or may not recall, I made a post a few weeks ago about brightness flickering from high to low. Well a day or two after that post all my component inputs died, well now its effecting my composite (had to put my cable box on this for now) and HDMI inputs much worse than it did the Component ones.<br />
<br />
I'm taking this as a sign that my TV is on the way out, so Ive been looking into possibly getting a new one. Called The Brick since I figured they would be able to suggest something, and the guy was trying to talk me into getting a <a href="http://www1.thebrick.com/brickb2c/jsp/catalog/product.jsp?id=LE42F2280&amp;navAction=jump&amp;navCount=2" target="_blank">Haier 42&quot; 1080p LED TV</a>. Wasn't sure if that would be as good as my current (<a href="http://www.crutchfield.com/S-RXU43W2Hmft/p_15840S4100/Sony-KDL-40S4100.html#details-tab" target="_blank">Sony Bravia KDL-40S4100</a>) or not so I decided to shop around more.<br />
<br />
<br />
Since this is the only forum I really go to I decided to come to you guys: <font color="#000000"><i>Anyone have any suggestions for a decent TV thats at least as good as my current one, but wont cost me a lot?</i></font><br />
<br />
I was hoping for a LED back-lit TV, with enough inputs to keep my set up (Composite: Wii, Component: Xbox 360, Cable box, HDMI: DVD player, PS3, and 1 spare) but it seems these days the new standard is two HDMI and one component, with most component inputs also using the composite video. I can at best fit a 42&quot;, assuming the frame is small, in my TV stand though I could possibly mod out the &quot;shelf&quot; a bit to fit a 46&quot;.<br />
<br />
(I'd prefer if the side inputs were on the right instead of the left since the right is open, but the left side is the standard so thats not really a priority for me.)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.psu.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/26-Technology">Technology</category>
			<dc:creator>Fenix</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/311047-Canadian-here-What-are-some-cheap-TVs-that-are-still-pretty-decent</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sony’s Bread and Butter? It’s Not Electronics</title>
			<link>http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/310835-Sony%C2%92s-Bread-and-Butter-It%C2%92s-Not-Electronics?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 07:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
TOKYO — Sony is best known as a consumer electronics company, making PlayStation game consoles and televisions. And it loses money on almost every gadget it sells.
Related


Sony has made money making Hollywood movies and selling music. That profitable part of the business is what Daniel S. Loeb, an American investor and manager of the hedge fund Third Point, wants Sony to spin off to raise cash to resuscitate its electronics business.

But as Mr. Loeb pressures Sony executives to do more to revive the company’s ailing electronics arm, some analysts are asking, Why bother?

Sony, it is suggested, might be better off just selling insurance.

Or just making movies and music. But not electronics.

A new report from the investment banking firm Jefferies delivered a harsh assessment of Sony’s electronics business. “Electronics is its Achilles’ heel and, in our view, it is worth zero,” wrote Atul Goyal, consumer technology analyst for Jefferies, in the report, released this week.

“In our view, it needs to exit most electronics markets.”

The maker of the Walkman and the Trinitron without electronics? What would it do?

Although Sony sells hundreds of products as varied as batteries and head-mounted 3-D displays, it so happens that Sony’s most successful business is selling insurance. While it doesn’t run this business in the United States or Europe, Sony makes a lot of money writing life, auto and medical policies in Japan.

Its financial arm accounts for 63 percent of Sony’s total operating profit last year. Life insurance has been its biggest moneymaker over the last decade, earning the company 933 billion yen ($9.07 billion) in operating profit in the 10 years that ended in March.

Sony’s film and music divisions, which produced hits like the Spider-Man movies and “Zero Dark Thirty” and recorded musicians like the cellist Yo-Yo Ma and the electronic music duo Daft Punk, have contributed $7 billion to the company’s bottom line over the last decade.

In that time, Sony’s electronics division has lost a cumulative $8.5 billion.

Hardly Sony’s crown jewels, experts say.

“The problem is that the board is still absolutely focused on fixing electronics,” said Kouji Yamada, a visiting professor at Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo and research director of Mission Value Partners, a Sonoma, Calif., investment company.

Sony’s chief executive, Kazuo Hirai, said last Wednesday that its board would consider Third Point’s proposal, even as it emphasized that the discussions were preliminary and that it had not set a time for a response.

But to a small band of analysts, Mr. Loeb’s prescriptions for Sony are shortsighted, merely milking the company’s profit-making content business for good money to throw after the bad.

As proof of the untenable future facing Sony’s electronics, critics point to its televisions and smartphones. Competition is intense, and in cellphones Sony remains a bit player. Even where it is more successful, in digital cameras or game consoles, it is struggling to stay abreast of stronger companies.

Sheer lack of managerial attention could soon start to hurt Sony’s insurance and entertainment divisions, Mr. Yamada warned. Sony Financial Holdings, a publicly traded company of which Sony owns 60 percent, has been underperforming its peers on the Tokyo stock exchange. Its share price has risen just 4 percent this year, compared to a 36 percent increase in shares of its rival, Dai-ichi Life Insurance.

And in the entertainment business, where alliances and tie-ups are starting to dominate strategy, Sony’s film and music units could be slowed by having to deal with a board that sits in Tokyo and does not have its hand on the pulse of a fast-moving industry, Mr. Yamada said.

“Maneuvering three completely different industries, that’s too much,” Mr. Yamada said. “These should all be separate companies.”

Sony maintains that its varied units make up a coherent whole. But the history of how it acquired its hodgepodge of companies suggests otherwise.

Sony’s co-founder, Akio Morita, first got the idea of buying a finance company on a trip to the United States in the 1950s to promote the company’s new transistor radio, according to an official recounting of its corporate history. On that trip, Mr. Morita was stunned by the sight of Chicago’s skyscrapers, especially the Prudential Building that dominated the Chicago skyline.

 “Why would a life insurance company have such an enormous building?” Mr. Morita marveled. “One day, we will also establish our own bank or financial institution and build a building like that.”


Mr. Morita’s wish was finally granted in 1981, when Sony started a life insurance venture in Japan with Prudential, the large American insurance company. Perhaps disappointingly, Sony Financial Holdings has its headquarters on the fourth floor of a nondescript midrise building in Tokyo.

Sony’s acquisitions of Columbia Pictures and CBS Records in the late 1980s got a lot more attention. Mr. Morita and the other company co-founder, Norio Ohga, had long contended that content was crucial in promoting Sony’s expanding electronics universe, first wading into music with a venture with CBS Records in 1968.

But infighting between hardware and movies hindered that objective from the start, as did misaligned incentives that led Sony to wrestle with how to build devices that let consumers download and copy content without undermining sales at its music labels or film studios.

“Sony has tried to make this strategy work for a long time,” said Gerhard Fasol, president of the Tokyo technology consulting firm Eurotechnology Japan, “But it’s never really worked. Each part would be better competing on its own.”

Insurance never had that conflict. Sony’s 4,100 “Lifeplanners” would visit homes and offices to offer advice and make sales. Sony also runs a Web-only bank, Sony Bank, which accepts deposits and offers mortgage products, investment trusts and foreign-exchange margin trading.

On Wednesday, Mr. Hirai defended the company’s continued focus on electronics. “Electronics has a future. And it is in Sony’s DNA,” he said at a corporate presentation. “It is my mission to revive it.”

There are some glimmers that Sony is finding its way again, even as Apple and Samsung widen their lead. Sony’s sleek new XPeria Z smartphone has received generally rave reviews. Photography buffs have called its high-end, full-frame RX1 camera the most advanced compact camera.

“Not so long ago, we had despaired at Sony’s ability to ever again produce stellar products (especially when faced with duds like the Dash alarm clock and the Rolly music player),” Damian Thong, Tokyo-based technology analyst at Macquarie Securities, said in a report published Thursday.

“Yet we now have had a consistent run of beautifully designed, technologically advanced, class-leading products,” Mr. Thong said. “We think these products hark back to Sony’s glory days.”

Last quarter, Sony was back in the black, but its electronics division continued to lose money.
---End Quote---
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/business/global/sonys-bread-and-butter-its-not-electronics.html?partner=yahoofinance&_r=0


Insurance? Who would have thought! I had no idea they were in that business.:disillusionment:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			TOKYO — Sony is best known as a consumer electronics company, making PlayStation game consoles and televisions. And it loses money on almost every gadget it sells.<br />
Related<br />
<br />
<br />
Sony has made money making Hollywood movies and selling music. That profitable part of the business is what Daniel S. Loeb, an American investor and manager of the hedge fund Third Point, wants Sony to spin off to raise cash to resuscitate its electronics business.<br />
<br />
But as Mr. Loeb pressures Sony executives to do more to revive the company’s ailing electronics arm, some analysts are asking, Why bother?<br />
<br />
Sony, it is suggested, might be better off just selling insurance.<br />
<br />
Or just making movies and music. But not electronics.<br />
<br />
A new report from the investment banking firm Jefferies delivered a harsh assessment of Sony’s electronics business. “Electronics is its Achilles’ heel and, in our view, it is worth zero,” wrote Atul Goyal, consumer technology analyst for Jefferies, in the report, released this week.<br />
<br />
“In our view, it needs to exit most electronics markets.”<br />
<br />
The maker of the Walkman and the Trinitron without electronics? What would it do?<br />
<br />
Although Sony sells hundreds of products as varied as batteries and head-mounted 3-D displays, it so happens that Sony’s most successful business is selling insurance. While it doesn’t run this business in the United States or Europe, Sony makes a lot of money writing life, auto and medical policies in Japan.<br />
<br />
Its financial arm accounts for 63 percent of Sony’s total operating profit last year. Life insurance has been its biggest moneymaker over the last decade, earning the company 933 billion yen ($9.07 billion) in operating profit in the 10 years that ended in March.<br />
<br />
Sony’s film and music divisions, which produced hits like the Spider-Man movies and “Zero Dark Thirty” and recorded musicians like the cellist Yo-Yo Ma and the electronic music duo Daft Punk, have contributed $7 billion to the company’s bottom line over the last decade.<br />
<br />
In that time, Sony’s electronics division has lost a cumulative $8.5 billion.<br />
<br />
Hardly Sony’s crown jewels, experts say.<br />
<br />
“The problem is that the board is still absolutely focused on fixing electronics,” said Kouji Yamada, a visiting professor at Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo and research director of Mission Value Partners, a Sonoma, Calif., investment company.<br />
<br />
Sony’s chief executive, Kazuo Hirai, said last Wednesday that its board would consider Third Point’s proposal, even as it emphasized that the discussions were preliminary and that it had not set a time for a response.<br />
<br />
But to a small band of analysts, Mr. Loeb’s prescriptions for Sony are shortsighted, merely milking the company’s profit-making content business for good money to throw after the bad.<br />
<br />
As proof of the untenable future facing Sony’s electronics, critics point to its televisions and smartphones. Competition is intense, and in cellphones Sony remains a bit player. Even where it is more successful, in digital cameras or game consoles, it is struggling to stay abreast of stronger companies.<br />
<br />
Sheer lack of managerial attention could soon start to hurt Sony’s insurance and entertainment divisions, Mr. Yamada warned. Sony Financial Holdings, a publicly traded company of which Sony owns 60 percent, has been underperforming its peers on the Tokyo stock exchange. Its share price has risen just 4 percent this year, compared to a 36 percent increase in shares of its rival, Dai-ichi Life Insurance.<br />
<br />
And in the entertainment business, where alliances and tie-ups are starting to dominate strategy, Sony’s film and music units could be slowed by having to deal with a board that sits in Tokyo and does not have its hand on the pulse of a fast-moving industry, Mr. Yamada said.<br />
<br />
“Maneuvering three completely different industries, that’s too much,” Mr. Yamada said. “These should all be separate companies.”<br />
<br />
Sony maintains that its varied units make up a coherent whole. But the history of how it acquired its hodgepodge of companies suggests otherwise.<br />
<br />
Sony’s co-founder, Akio Morita, first got the idea of buying a finance company on a trip to the United States in the 1950s to promote the company’s new transistor radio, according to an official recounting of its corporate history. On that trip, Mr. Morita was stunned by the sight of Chicago’s skyscrapers, especially the Prudential Building that dominated the Chicago skyline.<br />
<br />
 “Why would a life insurance company have such an enormous building?” Mr. Morita marveled. “One day, we will also establish our own bank or financial institution and build a building like that.”<br />
<br />
<br />
Mr. Morita’s wish was finally granted in 1981, when Sony started a life insurance venture in Japan with Prudential, the large American insurance company. Perhaps disappointingly, Sony Financial Holdings has its headquarters on the fourth floor of a nondescript midrise building in Tokyo.<br />
<br />
Sony’s acquisitions of Columbia Pictures and CBS Records in the late 1980s got a lot more attention. Mr. Morita and the other company co-founder, Norio Ohga, had long contended that content was crucial in promoting Sony’s expanding electronics universe, first wading into music with a venture with CBS Records in 1968.<br />
<br />
But infighting between hardware and movies hindered that objective from the start, as did misaligned incentives that led Sony to wrestle with how to build devices that let consumers download and copy content without undermining sales at its music labels or film studios.<br />
<br />
“Sony has tried to make this strategy work for a long time,” said Gerhard Fasol, president of the Tokyo technology consulting firm Eurotechnology Japan, “But it’s never really worked. Each part would be better competing on its own.”<br />
<br />
Insurance never had that conflict. Sony’s 4,100 “Lifeplanners” would visit homes and offices to offer advice and make sales. Sony also runs a Web-only bank, Sony Bank, which accepts deposits and offers mortgage products, investment trusts and foreign-exchange margin trading.<br />
<br />
On Wednesday, Mr. Hirai defended the company’s continued focus on electronics. “Electronics has a future. And it is in Sony’s DNA,” he said at a corporate presentation. “It is my mission to revive it.”<br />
<br />
There are some glimmers that Sony is finding its way again, even as Apple and Samsung widen their lead. Sony’s sleek new XPeria Z smartphone has received generally rave reviews. Photography buffs have called its high-end, full-frame RX1 camera the most advanced compact camera.<br />
<br />
“Not so long ago, we had despaired at Sony’s ability to ever again produce stellar products (especially when faced with duds like the Dash alarm clock and the Rolly music player),” Damian Thong, Tokyo-based technology analyst at Macquarie Securities, said in a report published Thursday.<br />
<br />
“Yet we now have had a consistent run of beautifully designed, technologically advanced, class-leading products,” Mr. Thong said. “We think these products hark back to Sony’s glory days.”<br />
<br />
Last quarter, Sony was back in the black, but its electronics division continued to lose money.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/business/global/sonys-bread-and-butter-its-not-electronics.html?partner=yahoofinance&amp;_r=0" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/bu...oofinance&amp;_r=0</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Insurance? Who would have thought! I had no idea they were in that business.:disillusionment:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.psu.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/26-Technology">Technology</category>
			<dc:creator>GreatSpaceKoaster</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/310835-Sony%C2%92s-Bread-and-Butter-It%C2%92s-Not-Electronics</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Having Trouble with my new laptop, will REP any help</title>
			<link>http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/310364-Having-Trouble-with-my-new-laptop-will-REP-any-help?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Okay, I'm having issues with my new laptop. I had to get another one because my other laptop's mother board fried or broke.

1. I have a HP printer that is compatible with it. The problem is, I lost the disc that comes with the printer when you first open the printer up. So now I can't even print anything from this computer to that printer because of something to do with drivers. I've gone to HP's site for drivers and nothing works. It won't install those drivers because it needs other drivers, probably the ones on that disc. Can anyone help with this problem?

2. This problem right here didn't start til I installed firefox. Now, whenever I'm on the internet, on either browser, there's these annoying ads everywhere. They're on the bottom, side, and appear whenever I click on a window. How can I get these ads to go away?

3. This is not an issue, but a question. This computer has an i3 processor and 2.2 speed. How come it's just as slow as a 2.0 computer I had here? The internet is the same. I'm confused about how fast a computer processes. Isn't that how fast pages load and how fast videos buffer?

Thank you! :D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Okay, I'm having issues with my new laptop. I had to get another one because my other laptop's mother board fried or broke.<br />
<br />
1. I have a HP printer that is compatible with it. The problem is, I lost the disc that comes with the printer when you first open the printer up. So now I can't even print anything from this computer to that printer because of something to do with drivers. I've gone to HP's site for drivers and nothing works. It won't install those drivers because it needs other drivers, probably the ones on that disc. Can anyone help with this problem?<br />
<br />
2. This problem right here didn't start til I installed firefox. Now, whenever I'm on the internet, on either browser, there's these annoying ads everywhere. They're on the bottom, side, and appear whenever I click on a window. How can I get these ads to go away?<br />
<br />
3. This is not an issue, but a question. This computer has an i3 processor and 2.2 speed. How come it's just as slow as a 2.0 computer I had here? The internet is the same. I'm confused about how fast a computer processes. Isn't that how fast pages load and how fast videos buffer?<br />
<br />
Thank you! :D</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.psu.com/forums/forumdisplay.php/26-Technology">Technology</category>
			<dc:creator>The Black Wolf</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/310364-Having-Trouble-with-my-new-laptop-will-REP-any-help</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
