Lmao,
Then in that case all games should be p.c based, wait they are
Printable View
Lmao,
Then in that case all games should be p.c based, wait they are
Some aren't, like the Net Yaroze PS1 creations. But yeah I see what you mean.
It's funny how much background information there is on Claude (date and place of birth, supposed French nationality - what?) on his GTA Wiki page when we know nothing of his life prior to 1992.
Other than his name there's no proof that he is of French nationality either.
It would be quite interesting to know what happened to characters like Claud and Tommy Vercetti.
Retirement homes where all go
The protagonist retreat
Not when all your dead enemies are the ones taking care of you lol
But I feel a timeline is not needed to understand were and why the protagonists are gone... It just fits the mystery of what we want it to be and to fill that missing cap
The idea about having 3 Protagonists in GTA V is kinda meh to say the least. That means we wont be able to focus on each character and they will lose their existance very fast as the previous protagonists which were the only ones in previuos gta games.
I agree, I think they should stick with just one.
Here is a funny
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtUSteNQOpw
Well we will see how the three protagonists work out,
If it fails then They will go back to one
I actually like the idea and love the thought of jumping from one to the other and seeing what each one is up to
----
On topic about Claude and the other 4 protagonists
How would we put these in order as the best and the worse of guys, we have Claude, Tommy, Carl, Victor and Tony
Now Tony and Claude have been in the same city twice
Tommy has been in vice city once and so has victor
Now Claude and Carl same city once.
And Claude has been the only one to be in two different cities...
Since the characters beside Tommy and Carl have only been in one city each
This means that Tony and Claude are the strongest protagonists rockstar have created.
Take from that has you will. But I feel that Claude was so well crafted to fit two different cities and Tony was well crafted to fit one city twice..
Could you imagine Tommy in San Andreas at any point and Carl in vice city at any point...
Yes Victor is vice cities verse of Carl... But Carl even if you took all the gangster stuff away, he still would not fit...
Now Claude and Tony could fit all games and still craft a story that feels so right
So I say Claude and Tony owns the era of the qautro trilogy of GTA III, VICE CITY, SAN ANDREAS, VICE CITY STORIES and LIBERTY CITY STORIES
China town wars does not fit this Q-Trilogy, because he is not connected to any main inconnection of the GTA timeline
Btw guys when Rosenberg called Tommy in the sa introduction and Tommy didnt respond is the reason really that they just couldnt reproduce Tommys voice again as the actor didnt want to? Or it was on purpose?
That was or could have been an ester egg mate
If I remember correctly, Rockstar was pissed at Ray Liotta because he only cared about the money. He thought he didn't get enough. At the same time, I think Tommy Vercetti cutting his ties with Ken Rosenberg was a nice touch for GTA III's overall canon.
That could be true.... But with vice city and San Andreas the cap being so close.. It leaves that untold part that could be filled with so many theories
Just like a famous film character we know
But Tommy and Ken could gave another run in a GTA game...
But their is so many caps in Claudes, Tommy, tonys stories... That we can not spoil the trilogy with these stories
The mysteries fit and should stay that way..
But it nevery hurts for us to fill in the caps
The driver which you get for the bank heist is so freaking strange. Probably the most strange GTA character.
San Andreas on PSN is the uncut Black Label version lol, enjoy Hot Coffee guys. :P
Yeah you're better off getting a Illusion game.
He was an awsome character king and one of the best nut jobs in vice city...
I would have to say Maccer, Kent Paul's mate in San Andreas was totally awsome