Oh God... Activision needs some freelance writers... A LOT of them. They're really dry with ideas! They seriously need to think more outside the box... If not, make a new box lmao
Printable View
Oh God... Activision needs some freelance writers... A LOT of them. They're really dry with ideas! They seriously need to think more outside the box... If not, make a new box lmao
Looks fine to me. I honestly don't know what people are expecting from pre-alpha footage....and I believe it looks good for what it is. Some of the comments on here have me dying. "Looks like a PS2 game." When's the last time you played a PS2 game? You should get your eyes checked....severely. It looks good. Could it look better? Of course...that's why they polish and playtest....sheesh.. people kill me. I'm not really interested in the game....but to say that it's pure crap....just seems way off base.
As much as I love TWD, I've played way too many first-person zombie games in my day. Other than the characters, this one will need a good hook to reel me in. I'm sure a lot of people will play it because of the name however.
left for dead with a walking dead name?
Honestly looks simply OK but it's an early build Im sure. From what I'm getting is everyone is jumping all over this because activision is at the helm. Don't get me wrong it looks outdated but i honestly never saw the fps walking dead amounting to much. I usually go by the old code of tv/movie games. They almost always suck.
Looks ok, will see what will come out of that. Not really that interested by it. Im not really into all these undead, zombie survival scenes.
This should be an epic FPS, but it looks run-of-the-mill. Remember sticking a knife through the eye of a Helghast soldier in Killzone 3? Now if only Guerrilla Games were behind it.