Same thing of the same thing over again. Activision is milking every penny they can.
Latest PSU headlines:
Results 1 to 25 of 62
Thread: MW3! looks terrible
-
06-06-2011 #1
MW3! looks terrible

-
06-06-2011 #2
Well, honestly I don't expect it to look much better then the Black Ops. I only buy them for different maps, guns, and gameplay.
/UPSET THE ESTABLISHED ORDER AND EVERYTHING BECOMES CHAOS\


-
06-06-2011 #3
disagreed. It looked awesome.
-
06-06-2011 #4Supreme Veteran







- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 19,482
- Rep Power
- 121
- Points
- 62,898 (0 Banked)
Looked pretty good to me which is something I wasn't expecting.
-
06-06-2011 #5Chipmunk Enthusiast







- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Portsmouth
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 15,961
- Rep Power
- 112
- Points
- 13,256 (0 Banked)
Didn't take long to get our first complainer did it?
Trophy-licious!
-
06-06-2011 #6
30 dollar title.
I don't need no relationship with my tv. Why the hell should I pay you more money to use features I can get at the touch of a button on my remote? Oh, you want me to use these features with a camera and my voice instead? I'm not that damn lazy and I want to save some money FOR GAMES.
-
06-06-2011 #7Earthbound







- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Taking my seat at the Fancy Pets Council
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 15,748
- Rep Power
- 100
- Points
- 2,065 (72 Banked)
Looks pretty good to me. I will pick this up.
Please keep this civilised guys.
-
06-06-2011 #8
Nah man, this is what MW is. I love the MW franchise, gimme
-
06-06-2011 #9Elite Member







- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- New York
- Age
- 25
- Posts
- 1,844
- Rep Power
- 42
- Points
- 7,277 (0 Banked)
I'll wait for the price to drop. It looks fun, but not mind-blowing.
Kind of like all the other past CoD titles.I talk to myself because I'm the only one whose answers I accept.
-
06-06-2011 #10
-
06-06-2011 #11
-
06-06-2011 #12Elite Guru







- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- @Home
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 5,239
- Rep Power
- 56
- Points
- 44,381 (0 Banked)
Same thing? O_o
GIMP Designer

-
06-06-2011 #13
I despise Activision for turning to **** everything they touch, but the scene where you escape that ship looked awesome.
-
06-06-2011 #14
dont get me wrong i love games that are a a reskin of a game that was also a reskin. graphics only go skin deep. I dont think they could possibly make the online worse than blops though

-
06-06-2011 #15
Battlefield will be much better I hope, I am getting tired of MW =/
I didn't think it looked terrible, but I just wasn't interested in the same thing again haha
-
06-06-2011 #16
-
06-06-2011 #17
-
06-06-2011 #18Veteran







- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Age
- 28
- Posts
- 4,698
- Rep Power
- 52
- Points
- 11,666 (0 Banked)
I thought it looked amazing and I can't wait. This year has a lot coming that interests me on Xbox 360.
Steam ID: satchgear
XBL GT: satchgear
PSN ID: westsco
-
06-06-2011 #19
That submarine interior scene looks nothing like a real submarine interior. They were making it look like it was wide open as a football field and that couldn't be farther from the facts, even for a supposed boomer. Even SSBN's are cramped and the bridge is a fraction of the size shown. The launch code sequence was pretty laughable. It doesn't take just a two-man key and fire buttons. There is a two part launch code that has to be joined together for the launch authorization to unlock the keys. Boomers are not fixed in place at time of launch like a land missile site, so there is some target steering that is required. Then the whole launching sequence was a real mystery, where they dug that up. It also kind of left the question where those missiles were going. Just one Trident boat has enough warheads to vaporize every major city on the planet, essentially bringing civilization as we know it to an end. There were way too many battleships in the harbor, MW3 looked more like WWII. The opening scene did look like a side show, with the main gameplay being the same old thing except in city combat on foot, just like every other CoD. Too much of the same old thing.
-
06-06-2011 #20
-
06-06-2011 #21A God Amongst Men







- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- NYC
- Age
- 21
- Posts
- 9,707
- Rep Power
- 80
- Points
- 3,291 (0 Banked)
-
06-06-2011 #22
Yeah, I know that but it really took any dramatic seriousness away from the level. It also shows they didn't put much effort into research to at least make the submarine interior halfway convincing. There were a lot of other technical problems that ruined that sequence plus it made it look like just more of the same. It is a real mystery to me why so many people find the same gameplay over and over and over to be so fascinating, and not with reference to fps in general. There is a lot of variety in the fps genre, but CoD has the exact same gameplay, gun mechanics and action, in spite of where the locale is supposed to be. Actually, MW seems to be CoD WWII with a newer looking cover. The graphics were not all that improved either.
-
06-06-2011 #23
-
06-06-2011 #24
-
06-06-2011 #25
It doesn't need a "change". The game is loved by millions.... that's what matters. They don't care about pleasing the fanboys that will never like the game no matter what they do.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)





Reply With Quote









Bookmarks