Lens of Truth screen shot comparison PS3 vs. 360

[NotoriousBOB]

Link

[AaronSOLDIER]

Like someone in the comments said, I think they make the PS3 version shit on purpose, its an embarrassment of a port. Glad I'm not into this series anymore.

[Lethal_NFS]

The PS3 looks terrible in these pictures. I swear the lens of truth is sometimes the lens of crap

[Yuuichi]

The PS3 looks terrible in these pictures. I swear the lens of truth is sometimes the lens of crap

They got busted for rigging before. Only takes one time to ruin creditability.

[Shibby]

its like they just adjusted the brightness levels. other than the brightness, it just looks like the ps3 version has a bit more aliasing.

[emmerich]

When I played the PS3 version it never looked that bad.. seriously.

I'll wait til I play the 360 version later and do a self comparison.

[TDbank24]

I doubt those are the actual screen shots for the PS3 version. Lens of Truth is never right. I think we'll see the PS3 version shine come tomorrow.

[keefy]

Looks like a poor phoshop job to me see all the white pixels on the edge of his hat also on the structure thing in the back ground.

That was my first reaction when I saw it not suggesting they actually photo shopped it although from comments above I wouldn't put it past them.

[ps3freak18]

Seriously. Something is going on in these images. The PS3 version has more detail but the brightness is all fucked up on both of them. Xbox is too dark and PS3 is too damn bright. Something fishy is definitely going on.

[DarkVincent07]

The PS3 version seems so washed out in this comparison.. I don't know if its my TV settings but I had the game on infront of me when I read this article before and it doesn't look nearly as horrible :/

[coolguy]

it seems like the lens of thruth is bull... i never buy in to what this site says

[Daggers21]

That is so full of Bull it's not even funny. I laugh at all the comparisons people make like this where it's so clear that the brightness is turned up way to high or too low.

[Sufi]

If true, that's just embarrassing.

[emmerich]

I wouldn't count it out as bull just yet. It wouldn't surprise me, but at the same time I never noticed it to look that bad when I played the campaign from start to end and I've also played countless hours of MP and it don't seem to be that bad.

[Lethal_NFS]

I wouldn't count it out as bull just yet. It wouldn't surprise me, but at the same time I never noticed it to look that bad when I played the campaign from start to end and I've also played countless hours of MP and it don't seem to be that bad.

So which is it? Count it as bull or not?

[Bigdoggy]

Lens of truth has been busted for doing stuff to the pictures or adjusting settings to favor one over the other, seriously. They've been busted before and they keep on doing what they do and that is siding with 360 even if it means not giving a fair comparison which Lens of truth has done time and time again and still to this day continue to do.

it's pretty damn clear from those comparisons that RGB isn't set to limited rather than full. As a matter of fact, every comparison LoT has done seems to be more or less bullshit since i must have this magical TV set that looks 10x better then what they are comparing it on.

LoT always seems to doctor the comparisons to bring Xbox360 into favor, this is not really news because anyone with a half of a brain cell would be able to see when they are doctoring or not. RGB again limited in this comparison vs RGB set to full. Their MW2 comparisons are the same also, with that odd haze which only happens when RGB is set to limited. If you ever see that odd haze in a video comparison, understand that, that comparison is completely bs to being with.

trust me when I say, they know about the full or limited setting. Granted some things do come out on top for PS3 on that site but that's obvious, they try to make every not as noticeable on there end. Kind of a joke, LoT, IGN, etc etc some of these sites are just chalk full of gumps.

http://www.smgamers.com/?p=3443

[Ghost-Rhayne]

I'm not buying this game, but out of interest I will wait for the DF comparison to see how much LOT are corrupt.

[MjW]

And I was hoping to get some help deciding which platform to go for MW3.

[Nitey]

The PS3 version is so washed out in comparison
Though whenever places like LoT find ps3 version washed out - it never looks like that on my TV

Edit: Check the 2nd to last screenshot on the 2nd page. Captured near enough at the same time but the PS3 versions subtitles are all dull and dim (as they are in other shots). I can't imagine the subs looking as such on my TV, as they never have done in previous CoD games

Must be some settings issues. If you take out the fact that the PS3 version looks lifeless - it looks ok

[MjW]

Aww, screw that. I'll go by past experience (Black Ops) and get this for the 360. Ordered.

[dc89]

Black Ops was such a shoddy port I was so disappointed. I remember the jungle map, I thought the frame rate was lag at first, but it soon dawned on me.

Couple that with the fact no one has reviewed the PS3 version and I just can't risk getting it on PS3.

[DJDJ]

Yeah its a no brainer to get COD or any FPS on 360

[mickice]

PS3 looks washed out and the 360 has heavy black / white crush issues. How can some developers get it so wrong.

[NotoriousBOB]

I know nothing about LOT's credibility toward PS3 vs. 360 comparison pics. I do know that the PS3 version of BF3 was favored during the analysis. That's a pretty big game and if what i'm reading from many of you, it seems LOT should be favoring the 360 instead.

[Bigdoggy]

Hell will freeze over the day that a legit comparison is made.