Why isn't this a legit comparison?
Latest PSU headlines:
Results 26 to 50 of 59
-
11-08-2011 #26
-
11-08-2011 #27PSU Staff Writer







- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Wigan, England
- Age
- 22
- Posts
- 7,585
- Rep Power
- 69
- Points
- 8,089 (0 Banked)
It wouldn't surprise me if these were photoshopped. LoT have done stuff like that before.
-
11-08-2011 #28
-
11-08-2011 #29
-
11-08-2011 #30
Well I've been on the PS3 version a lot today and it looks good. Not like those screenies there
Anyway, all CoDs look better on 360 as it will always be lead for this series and maybe get a bit of extra love. But this game looks good and runs good on PS3 no doubt about it
Bit surprised you can't sign in to another psn profile if you go splitscreen online..Thought that was gonna be a feature

-
11-08-2011 #31
-
11-09-2011 #32Elite Guru







- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- @Home
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 5,473
- Rep Power
- 60
- Points
- 37,649 (10,000 Banked)
Apart from the lighting, I don't see anything wrong with the PS3 version of those pics.
-
11-09-2011 #33Veteran







- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Age
- 28
- Posts
- 4,841
- Rep Power
- 54
- Points
- 13,396 (0 Banked)
-
11-09-2011 #34Master Guru







- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Age
- 27
- Posts
- 6,155
- Rep Power
- 55
- Points
- 20,926 (0 Banked)
Once again there is nothing wrong with the PS3 version. Another bullshit comparison by LoT. They need to log off the internet.
The game i see on my TV is never the game they show in their little comparisons. Is the 360 version of Call of Duty games among other multiplats better at times? Sometimes but these screenshots were messed with. I'm now convinced LoT runs the 360 version at normal settings and the PS3 version at low settings.
-
11-09-2011 #35
-
11-09-2011 #36Super Elite







- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 2,045
- Rep Power
- 21
- Points
- 9,729 (0 Banked)
Bingo. The screens were tampered with.
私は日本語がわかります。図書館で読みます。ビール飲みます。

-
11-09-2011 #37
-
11-09-2011 #38Master Guru







- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Bristol!!
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 7,483
- Rep Power
- 68
- Points
- 10,735 (15,799 Banked)
C'mon, Fear, you know better than that
I Like Games.
-
11-09-2011 #39Ultimate Veteran







- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Dallas, TX.
- Age
- 31
- Posts
- 21,670
- Rep Power
- 138
- Points
- 34,575 (0 Banked)
Oh God not this again lol. Why can't we just get over it? Just get the game and enjoy it. I don't give a crap if it's worse on the PS3. If I cared about the game, I would get it regardless.
If you own both consoles, get the 360 version. Done.
-
11-09-2011 #40
-
11-09-2011 #41Elite Guru







- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- @Home
- Age
- 24
- Posts
- 5,473
- Rep Power
- 60
- Points
- 37,649 (10,000 Banked)
-
11-09-2011 #42Veteran







- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Age
- 28
- Posts
- 4,841
- Rep Power
- 54
- Points
- 13,396 (0 Banked)
-
11-09-2011 #43
-
11-10-2011 #44Super Elite







- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 2,045
- Rep Power
- 21
- Points
- 9,729 (0 Banked)
The Xbox and PS3 are very similar in powerful, and yet people still believe LoT "comparisons"
私は日本語がわかります。図書館で読みます。ビール飲みます。

-
11-10-2011 #45
-
11-10-2011 #46No thank you. I'll be gaming DRM free on a stronger console for $100 cheaper instead

Sony trolled MS. PS4 fans didn't do it. We just laughed at MS and anyone getting mad. $399 FTW!
-
Sufi thinks this post is the dogs danglies.
-
11-10-2011 #47Ultimate Veteran







- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Dallas, TX.
- Age
- 31
- Posts
- 21,670
- Rep Power
- 138
- Points
- 34,575 (0 Banked)
^lol
-
11-10-2011 #48
What happened to the discussion...
No thank you. I'll be gaming DRM free on a stronger console for $100 cheaper instead
Sony trolled MS. PS4 fans didn't do it. We just laughed at MS and anyone getting mad. $399 FTW!
-
11-10-2011 #49
I dunno, you have anything to add?
-
11-10-2011 #50
The main difference I can see in that video between the consoles is sharper textures in places on the 360 version (expected since most CoD games go same route). The ps3 version in that video looks like it does on my TV: Fine
Nothing like the screen caps from LoT though, they seemed quite bad.. I think overall, the Xbox version just has a bit more polish on it - The main thing however is a constant 60fps and at no point have I felt it drop below that since getting it on release day. It runs flawlessly and smooth all the time for me. It just 'feels' well coded for the ps3..Didnt get the same vibe from Blops (hated that game)
Edit: Just to add, I have both consoles as a lot of users here do. But at no point have I regretted the PS3 version after seeing the 360 version looks a tad crisper (performance wise I expect them both to be even)
Whilst these comparisons are usually to help multiconsole owners like myself make a decision. I find that in the end when I have to put my foot down, it ultimately comes down to controller pref/trophy-ach pref/friends list - The decision is even easier when the differences aren't huge or noticeable when playing like in this case with MW3Last edited by Nitey; 11-10-2011 at 15:42.

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)




Reply With Quote









Bookmarks