Official Assassin's Creed III thread

[Powka]

I wonder if it's worth getting for multiplayer. Probably not too many people are playing, I mean if you compare..

[Joe Zombie]

I personally never cared for the multiplayer in AC games. I wouldn't get it for the MP, the campaign is great enough on its own to warrant a purchase.

[-Kwesnoth-]

I have kept to my vow of disposing of every person I have killed. Non-mission of course. It has been a pain, but it keeps my person more realistic in thats how you would have to do it.

I'm currently at 75% completion. How bout you guys?

[claud3]

i did it at 85% and i missed a few things out

But i am happy not getting 100% in all missions, some i feel do not need the wee tasked

[vincentkaka]

One thing that i don't understand about assassins creed 3 is the economic system, why would you have people trade for money when there is little use for it, why not allow us to buy property homes for large amounts of money and create our own little armies or do something that makes the economy worthwhile, like ordering cannons and weapons which arrive by boat if near coast or by wagon if inland, for the most part once you beat the main story it is pretty boring, and they didn't include the incredible boat missions in multiplayer imagine multiplayer with those boats teams fighting other teams or ffa it would be incredible, you would be able to upgrade your boat and level your crew with money it would cost more and more money and you would have to play a lot to get it there would be no shortcut to it, it would make the game more fun

[Hayzoo5]

They're talking about AC4 all over their facebook page right now...

[GrandWazoo]

I wonder if it's worth getting for multiplayer. Probably not too many people are playing, I mean if you compare..

Sure, if you compare it to some. But its busier if you compare it to others. The important thing is that you can always find matches, no problem. It IS a major franchise game, enough people have bought it that there are always people online looking for a match. Every time I play multi there is no problem finding people.

[claud3]

AC4, is a next gen game only and i do not see it on the current console

I believe they will have the biggest area to explore ever and more focus on the assassin and less on modern day events

[Hayzoo5]

MP is only as good as the # of peope playing. Recruit! Organize!

[claud3]

that's so true, i avoid MP and never thought of playing it

No point to it at all and it makes no sense if the assassin part is not used at all or fully

[admartian]

WTF was with that ending? Talk about cliff-hanger or a non-ending lol.

=/= ME3 ending.

[GrandWazoo]

MP is only as good as the # of peope playing. Recruit! Organize!

MP is only s good as the QUALITY of people playing it. I DO agree that you ave to have enough people to get a diverse assortment of matches going, but with a title this big that isn't an issue.

[claud3]

WTF was with that ending? Talk about cliff-hanger or a non-ending lol.

=/= ME3 ending.

I know it freaking sucked big nasty cheese, they really never thought it all the way through and rushed it, it seems

I was shocked that the ending was so bad

[admartian]

I know it freaking sucked big nasty cheese, they really never thought it all the way through and rushed it, it seems

I was shocked that the ending was so bad

I know they wanted to keep it open while closing the book (it seems) on a character. But that was just the wrong way to do it.

It seemed that Ubi and Bioware hired the same guy for the ending writing - and he was running out of time for both and just wen with what he had!

[-Kwesnoth-]

Yeah, the ending was kinda fucked. It hints that there will be another game with Connor, with him being invited to France, which could lead to him being a key player in the French Revolution. And also Juno, or Minerva say that Connor's adventure was not over(of course not in those words).

So I look forward to the future of the franchise.

[claud3]

I know they wanted to keep it open while closing the book (it seems) on a character. But that was just the wrong way to do it.

It seemed that Ubi and Bioware hired the same guy for the ending writing - and he was running out of time for both and just wen with what he had!

either that or he dropped the brain cell and someone else picked it up and went with it

May AC4 make up for this and DESMOND is actually not in it at all and it is a new person or the entire focus on the ASSASSIN, instead of the modern character

[IranDennis]

guys my question to you is, i only played the first assasins creed. Should I buy this game?

[claud3]

yes mate... Go to youtube and check out the gameplay

check out it's wiki

[GrandWazoo]

guys my question to you is, i only played the first assasins creed. Should i buy this game?

yes!

say peeps, the Tyranny of King Washington now has a release date, Feb 19:

http://www.joystiq.com/2013/01/24/ac...one-on-feb-19/

[LegendaryAim]

What.The.Fuck. was that ending?

[GrandWazoo]

What.The.Fuck. was that ending?

No likey?

[claud3]

the ending was a waste of time and effort, the end was such a waste of playing the whole game through

So i play the game up to the ability to hunt and stop their

[GrandWazoo]

I wasn't too keen on the ending either actually. I liked the rest of the game though, the small bit at the end I didn't like doesn't do anything to kill my enjoyment of the rest of the game.

[claud3]

the desmond part of the game was so worthless and stupid... Focus more on the ASSASSIN from now on in with the next installment of ASSASSIN CREED

[GrandWazoo]

Focus more on the ASSASSIN from now on in with the next installment of ASSASSIN CREED

On this I can agree with you wholly!