Skyrim: A mixed bag

[Rapture]

No,ever since i started playing games i always play on the default difficulty ( Normal ) if the game throws me a bunch of enemies with very advanced levels that doesn't mean that i suck and i need to play on easy,it just means that the game is unfair,and i don't like that.

That's a really self-centered and childish way of viewing things. You couldn't handle the normal difficulty (which isn't difficult at all) and chose to blame the game for it instead of simply adjusting how you play or the difficulty.

[MysticStrummer]

I didn't have many bug problems with Skyrim on PS3. Just some quests that wouldn't leave my log once they were done, one backwards flying dragon that was very very high up in the sky, and citizens/guards in Whiterun that would appear in my house if they were nearby when I went inside. I just found the game to be pretty boring in general once the "Wow this world is big" effect wore off. Sure there are a lot of quests, but most amount to "Go to A and Kill or Get B". The combat is pretty average at best and the AI is subpar more often than not. Dark Souls was my Game of the Year, and Skyrim wouldn't even have been runner-up if it was up to me. Dragon's Dogma looks like an overall better game to me as well, though I know some (perhaps many) will disagree.

[Sufi]

I'm definitely enjoying the game a lot more than when I started this thread.

I think the key is to not expect the best and just go with what works.

I think the perk system is the biggest joke but it's better than Oblivion (which didn't have one).

For me, the point has been to explore dungeons and doing quests whenever I'm bored.

Overall, it's a great game and I think you can't expect too much...it's still one of the best games out on the market and that's what all matters right?