Please reconsider your news articles!

[TDbank24]

I don't really read the articles that much but the times i have i haven't found them out of line or anything. They're articles. As long as they bring some noteworthy information that's all that really matters in my opinion.

Maybe the 'nobody gives a shit about MGS Online' header was a bit much because plenty of people enjoyed it and while it had its flaws i still found fun in it. Otherwise, no issues here.

[Mr.Bishop]

Maybe the 'nobody gives a shit about MGS Online' header was a bit much because plenty of people enjoyed it and while it had its flaws i still found fun in it. Otherwise, no issues here.

Of course the argument being that if people really gave a shit, the game would still be around.

There is something to be said for making a solid point on something that polarizes what you're talking about.

[Lethal_NFS]

Of course the argument being that if people really gave a shit, the game would still be around.

There is something to be said for making a solid point on something that polarizes what you're talking about.

I can honestly say that I did not give a shit. I thought the header pretty much showed how we are a layed back site. There are too many gaming forums that are so damn uptight.

[Wrath]

I understand your point.

However, please refrain from deliberately misleading readers only to get hits. Soul Sacrifice for example has absolutely nothing to do with Demon's Souls (not even in the slightest) and the latter was only mentioned to get more hits or because staff didn't know better.

THAT is bullocks to be honest.

Other than that I am fine with what you're trying to say here.

[F34R]

I can honestly say that I did not give a shit. I thought the header pretty much showed how we are a layed back site. There are too many gaming forums that are so damn uptight.

Some areas, content, this place isn't uptight. Other things, it is. It's fine to say that this place is laid back to a degree, but it isn't forum/site wide.