After watching it a few weeks back, I found that was really only the case when you were actually looking for what is wrong. Just sitting back taking everything in the first time, I didn't find anything stand out that bad to make it unbearable or anything. It flowed well for me.
Latest PSU headlines:
View Poll Results: What is your rating for this film?
- 23. You may not vote on this poll
Results 101 to 106 of 106
Linux Mint 13 "Maya" with the MATE 1.6 desktop environment.
Long live the Penguin!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Northern Ireland
- PSN ID
- Rep Power
- 32,602 (0 Banked)
The only thing that stuck out to me like a sore thumb was all the horse scenes..the stunt doubles were horribly obvious, especially for Bilbo.Trophy-licious!
I saw it with a normal FPS and in 3D. The movie itself was different from LoTR, very upbeat for the most part (I'm sure the book is too) and I felt it was a great start to the trilogy (although I don't think it needed to be a trilogy). I think the CGI was very well done, as well as the 3D.
I recently watched LotR extended trilogy on bluray, and the tv I saw it on ran at a very high fps. I'm assuming it causes the same effect as Hobbit in 48 fps because at first it looked very strange and made the cgi/live action look less impressive. However I did get used to it and flashback scenes (like the battle at the beginning of fellowship) looked much better once I was used to the frame rate.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)