Face-Off: DmC Devil May Cry....

**Yungstar 2006** · 01-15-2013

on balance, the 360 version edges it thanks to the more consistent performance and palpable lack of screen-tear.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-dmc-face-off

**radgamer420** · 01-15-2013

So 360 version has better framerates and no screen tear. Sounds like the 360 version is the one to get.

**AaronSOLDIER** · 01-15-2013

Too much releasing this year for me to buy it anytime soon, won't be anywhere near 1-4 though.

**Soldier 95B** · 01-15-2013

No surprise here, especially with it on the Unreal engine.

**Fenix** · 01-17-2013

Its unreal, its no surprise.

**AaronSOLDIER** · 01-17-2013

Batman AA looked better on PS3 as did UT3, so it can be done.

**radgamer420** · 01-17-2013

Originally Posted by AaronSOLDIER

Batman AA looked better on PS3 as did UT3, so it can be done.

UT3 didnt. It just had user created maps on PS3 that 360 didnt have but it didnt look better.

**Lethal_NFS** · 01-17-2013

Originally Posted by AaronSOLDIER

Batman AA looked better on PS3 as did UT3, so it can be done.

Finished the game on both consoles, and I have to give a slight edge to the 360. But if it makes you feel any better, I give the Wii U version the edge over both of them.

Whoops! I thought this was about Arkham City. Don't mind me.

**Soldier 95B** · 01-17-2013

Originally Posted by Fenix

Its unreal, its no surprise.

Its like unreal was designed around the 360 hardware.

Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2

**AaronSOLDIER** · 01-17-2013

Do you have any comparisons? It did come to 360 6 months later though so wouldn't be surprising.

**Soldier 95B** · 01-17-2013

As for Batman AA, looks like the 360 had the edge at Digital Foundry too:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...ace-off?page=3

**radgamer420** · 01-17-2013

Well there you go. Thanks for that info Soldier.

**AaronSOLDIER** · 01-17-2013

Originally Posted by Soldier 95B

As for Batman AA, looks like the 360 had the edge at Digital Foundry too:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...ace-off?page=3

That's Arkham City, which had better lighting on PS3 but texture popin on PS3 as well (but tbh I never had any popins).

AA looked better on PS3 and had a better camera (due to it being further back), plus it had the Joker maps (which doesn't mean anything in a comparison thread for graphics but yeah).

**radgamer420** · 01-17-2013

Originally Posted by AaronSOLDIER

That's Arkham City, which had better lighting on PS3 but texture popin on PS3 as well (but tbh I never had any popins).

AA looked better on PS3 and had a better camera (due to it being further back), plus it had the Joker maps (which doesn't mean anything in a comparison thread for graphics but yeah).

And despite the joker maps it still sold better on 360.

**AaronSOLDIER** · 01-18-2013

Originally Posted by radgamer420

And despite the joker maps it still sold better on 360.

lol no it didn't, even AC without any exclusive DLC did better on PS3. Dunno why you're so against PS3 in all these threads lately.

**Soldier 95B** · 01-17-2013

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xb...article?page=2

So basically this is a game well worthy of its 8/10 score on both consoles. PS3 owners can point to the love for the FPS purist and all the goodies associated with the user-generated content. 360 gamers on the other hand get a slightly better-looking release, superior offline multiplayer options and more in-map bling. Both releases are equally fantastic games.

**Soldier 95B** · 01-17-2013

Originally Posted by AaronSOLDIER

That's Arkham City, which had better lighting on PS3 but texture popin on PS3 as well (but tbh I never had any popins).

AA looked better on PS3 and had a better camera (due to it being further back), plus it had the Joker maps (which doesn't mean anything in a comparison thread for graphics but yeah).

Damn. Stupid link in google said AA. POS!!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

**Ghost-Rhayne** · 01-18-2013

Deja vu lol.

**radgamer420** · 01-18-2013

Originally Posted by Ghost-Rhayne

Deja vu lol.

Tell me about it. lol

**SomaXD** · 01-21-2013

PS3 version is the better version imo... having both and decided to stick with it on the PS3 due to better textures and controls on the DualShock3(DS3 is a million times better than the 360 controller for this game... when it requires you to constantly hold the triggers for crazy combos the 360 controller is just too damn stiff and uncomfortable and awkward.)

**Soldier 95B** · 01-21-2013

**radgamer420** · 01-21-2013

The DS3 is the better controller for this game but the framerate and screen tearing issues would really put me off. I'll take better performance over some slightly better textures any day.

**SomaXD** · 01-21-2013

Originally Posted by radgamer420

The DS3 is the better controller for this game but the framerate and screen tearing issues would really put me off. I'll take better performance over some slightly better textures any day.

Thats actually incorrect... The differences between both in terms of framerate and tearing is indiscriminate i noticed it equally on both

**radgamer420** · 01-21-2013

Originally Posted by SomaXD

Thats actually incorrect... The differences between both in terms of framerate and tearing is indiscriminate i noticed it equally on both

So DF is lying now? Sorry I'll take their word over yours. Plus I watched the comparison videos.

**SomaXD** · 01-22-2013

Originally Posted by radgamer420

So DF is lying now? Sorry I'll take their word over yours. Plus I watched the comparison videos.

Its not that they are lying, rather, the differences they underline are so small its hardly noticable... Dont just listen to me, or DF, try them both yourself if you can and make your own decision