Face-Off: DmC Devil May Cry....

[Yungstar 2006]

on balance, the 360 version edges it thanks to the more consistent performance and palpable lack of screen-tear.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-dmc-face-off

[radgamer420]

So 360 version has better framerates and no screen tear. Sounds like the 360 version is the one to get.

[AaronSOLDIER]

Too much releasing this year for me to buy it anytime soon, won't be anywhere near 1-4 though.

[Soldier 95B]

No surprise here, especially with it on the Unreal engine.

[Fenix]

Its unreal, its no surprise.

[AaronSOLDIER]

Batman AA looked better on PS3 as did UT3, so it can be done.

[Soldier 95B]

Its unreal, its no surprise.

Its like unreal was designed around the 360 hardware.

Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2

[radgamer420]

Batman AA looked better on PS3 as did UT3, so it can be done.

UT3 didnt. It just had user created maps on PS3 that 360 didnt have but it didnt look better.

[AaronSOLDIER]

Do you have any comparisons? It did come to 360 6 months later though so wouldn't be surprising.

[Soldier 95B]

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xb...article?page=2

So basically this is a game well worthy of its 8/10 score on both consoles. PS3 owners can point to the love for the FPS purist and all the goodies associated with the user-generated content. 360 gamers on the other hand get a slightly better-looking release, superior offline multiplayer options and more in-map bling. Both releases are equally fantastic games.

[Soldier 95B]

As for Batman AA, looks like the 360 had the edge at Digital Foundry too:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...ace-off?page=3

[radgamer420]

Well there you go. Thanks for that info Soldier.

[AaronSOLDIER]

As for Batman AA, looks like the 360 had the edge at Digital Foundry too:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/di...ace-off?page=3

That's Arkham City, which had better lighting on PS3 but texture popin on PS3 as well (but tbh I never had any popins).

AA looked better on PS3 and had a better camera (due to it being further back), plus it had the Joker maps (which doesn't mean anything in a comparison thread for graphics but yeah).

[radgamer420]

That's Arkham City, which had better lighting on PS3 but texture popin on PS3 as well (but tbh I never had any popins).

AA looked better on PS3 and had a better camera (due to it being further back), plus it had the Joker maps (which doesn't mean anything in a comparison thread for graphics but yeah).

And despite the joker maps it still sold better on 360.

[Lethal_NFS]

Batman AA looked better on PS3 as did UT3, so it can be done.

Finished the game on both consoles, and I have to give a slight edge to the 360. But if it makes you feel any better, I give the Wii U version the edge over both of them.


Whoops! I thought this was about Arkham City. Don't mind me.

[Soldier 95B]

That's Arkham City, which had better lighting on PS3 but texture popin on PS3 as well (but tbh I never had any popins).

AA looked better on PS3 and had a better camera (due to it being further back), plus it had the Joker maps (which doesn't mean anything in a comparison thread for graphics but yeah).

Damn. Stupid link in google said AA. POS!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[AaronSOLDIER]

And despite the joker maps it still sold better on 360.

lol no it didn't, even AC without any exclusive DLC did better on PS3. Dunno why you're so against PS3 in all these threads lately.

[radgamer420]

lol no it didn't, even AC without any exclusive DLC did better on PS3. Dunno why you're so against PS3 in all these threads lately.

Umm..yes it did. And I'm not against PS3 just because I'm not the raving Sony cheerleader you would like me to be. I state my honest opinions good and bad. I just call them how I see them. I've criticised 360 and MS plenty and even had the xbox guys argue with me so dont try to paint me with that brush. And if my opinions offend you so much then you might want to take a closer look at yourself and ask yourself why that really is.

[Ghost-Rhayne]

Deja vu lol.

[radgamer420]

Deja vu lol.

Tell me about it. lol

[Yungstar 2006]

lol no it didn't, even AC without any exclusive DLC did better on PS3. Dunno why you're so against PS3 in all these threads lately.

i know that AC (uk) had something like 65%-68% of its first weeks sales on 360, but if you have a link that shows different. by all means do.

come to think of it, i don't recall any PS3 game out selling 360 here. thats not to say it didn't have some.

[TDbank24]

Umm..yes it did. And I'm not against PS3 just because I'm not the raving Sony cheerleader you would like me to be. I state my honest opinions good and bad. I just call them how I see them. I've criticised 360 and MS plenty and even had the xbox guys argue with me so dont try to paint me with that brush. And if my opinions offend you so much then you might want to take a closer look at yourself and ask yourself why that really is.

Yeah, right.

Anyway, looks like the PS3 version of DMC is the way to go. Better textures, lighting, and everything else.

[radgamer420]

Anyway, looks like the PS3 version of DMC is the way to go. Better textures, lighting, and everything else.

Yeah, right.
As for the other thing youre the last person here that should be talking on that subject.

[SomaXD]

PS3 version is the better version imo... having both and decided to stick with it on the PS3 due to better textures and controls on the DualShock3(DS3 is a million times better than the 360 controller for this game... when it requires you to constantly hold the triggers for crazy combos the 360 controller is just too damn stiff and uncomfortable and awkward.)

[Soldier 95B]