@previous post, I'm not going to be looking for it. I simply said u can tell it if u look for it because the guy said no one can tell te difference
Results 26 to 32 of 32
Thread: So it's ok that...
Currently Playing: COD Ghosts, Battlefield 4, Assassins Creed 4
Play CoD on consoles then go play BF3 on consoles. A blind man could tell the difference between those 2 games.
- Join Date
- May 2011
- where the sun don't shine
- PSN ID
- Rep Power
we $#@!ed about the majority of games not being 1080p last gen now that all of them are natively 1080p looks like we'll have to wait until next generation to see a locked 60fps and by then we'll be complaining that the successor console isn't natively running in 2160p and it's just upscaled to 4k resolution.
we'll further complain that the games aren't running in super smooth 120fps and we just won't ever be happy will we?
we all need to get a grip and be happy with what we're getting, think about all the goodies sony packs into every generation, they give and they keep giving playstation plus eat your heart out OK but yeah we're getting it pretty good compared to the MS crowd, yeah they have 60FPS but they also have a VCR and Forza who gives a shiiit
Next gen will be awesome, without a doubt, so we should not be desperately searching for any slightest thing that might be a little less perfect than others.
Apart from that, I wonder if the human eye is actually able to see a difference between 30 and 60 fps or even 60 and 120 fps...
I don't think this frame rate vs art quality argument is going to go away any time soon. It is always a trade of for one or the other which people seem not to realize. If you can have a impressive looking game running at 60 fps, then you could have an even better looking game running at 30 fps. Its fundamentally up to the developers what they want to do.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)