I like them both!
If I had to pick...first party for sure.
The way I see it is:
First party = all about pushing the hardware and pleasing themselves (ther're vision over what's popular)
3rd party = all about pushing there next iteration of the same game out before the years out. More about pleasing there wallets than there fan base.
Of course that's my generalization of it all, but rings quite true in a lot of cases.
Results 26 to 29 of 29
Thread: First-Party vs Thrid-Party Games
Last edited by TEST SUBJECT 83; 10-01-2013 at 16:25. Reason: Worded what I was trying to say wrong :P
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- PSN ID
- Rep Power
First-Party vs Thrid-Party Games
Resistance 1 & 2
Uncharted 1 & 2
Motorstorm 1 & 2
Off the top of my head they're the exclusives I can remember buyingi7-3930K | Asus Rampage IV Extreme | 16GB Corsair Platinum DDR3 1866Mhz | Full Custom Watercooling
6GB EVGA GTX 980Ti SC+ | Corsair AX1200i | 2560x1440 144Hz Asus Rog Swift | Corsair Obsidian 800D |
500GB PS4 aka DestinyBox
There is only Nintendo Universe that first party surpass third party, and it is ugly. So I don't see a way somebody wishing that(•_•)
Stop preordering games! Stop buying day1 games! Stop being idiots!
I'll get Infamous Second Son day one, but it's not a launch title so for the launch tiles I actually went w/ WD and ACIV as well.
EDIT: Added PS3 Exclusives I own
Infamous 1 & 2
Uncharted 1, 2 and 3
Resistance 1 & 2
LittleBigPlanet 1 & 2
Ratchet and Clank (all 4 of them)
Killzone 2 & 3
Motorstorm 1, 2 & 3
GoW: Collection and III
Mod Nation Racers
Riiiiiddddggeee Raaaaaceeer 7!!!! (Had to be done - game sucked ass BTW)
Last edited by TAZ427; 10-08-2013 at 22:40.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)