Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst ... 2
Results 26 to 32 of 32
  1. #26
    Ultimate Veteran
    mickice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Australia, In a Kangaroo's pouch.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    22,051
    Rep Power
    129
    Points
    23,348 (40,000 Banked)
    Items PlayStationPS3 Slim
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    Quote Originally Posted by mistercrow View Post
    900p isnt bad and certainly better than 720p. That being said the PS4 version being at full 1080p would be the one to choose. DF will no doubt be looking for any graphical differences.
    Without even seeing the final product I expect better textures and probably more light sources on PS4.

    - Symmetrical thumb sticks for life -

  2. #27
    PSU Live Streamer
    YoungMullah88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Charlotte
    PSN ID
    xShadow__WoIf | YoungMullah88
    Posts
    14,689
    Rep Power
    114
    Points
    36,541 (1,800 Banked)
    Items User name style
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    Probably TR again low res textures and missing objects

    Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

  3. #28
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    32
    Posts
    31,382
    Rep Power
    194
    Points
    118,616 (0 Banked)
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    i was under the impression that 900p meant the monitor resolution of 1440 x 900. was not thinking about the 16:9 aspect ratio.

    also, i would not assume it was 1920 x 900 unless they stated it otherwise, because they would state that since it's definitely a big deal to do so.

    just like the order 1886 dev stated the 1920 x 800...because calling it 800p would be silly.

  4. #29
    Legend
    F34R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    PSN ID
    F34RTEHR34PER
    Posts
    40,122
    Rep Power
    244
    Points
    147,835 (0 Banked)
    Items BullySteamGran Turismo 5LiverpoolAppleJoker (limited ICON)Naughty DogMaster ChiefAssassins Creed EzioGears of WarHeavy RainDiablo III
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    I wouldn't think it's silly. I wonder why he thinks it would be silly.




  5. #30
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    32
    Posts
    31,382
    Rep Power
    194
    Points
    118,616 (0 Banked)
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    i meant to edit that and write "inaccurate" instead of silly.

    it would be the same thing if someone said that the game plays at 30fps but dips at points (to 20fps), they wouldn't say that the game runs at 20fps because that's not totally accurate.

  6. #31
    Legend
    F34R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    PSN ID
    F34RTEHR34PER
    Posts
    40,122
    Rep Power
    244
    Points
    147,835 (0 Banked)
    Items BullySteamGran Turismo 5LiverpoolAppleJoker (limited ICON)Naughty DogMaster ChiefAssassins Creed EzioGears of WarHeavy RainDiablo III
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    Quote Originally Posted by Sufi View Post
    i meant to edit that and write "inaccurate" instead of silly.

    it would be the same thing if someone said that the game plays at 30fps but dips at points (to 20fps), they wouldn't say that the game runs at 20fps because that's not totally accurate.
    Yeah, "inaccurate" would have been a completely different post lol.

    Hmm....

    I dunno, I guess it's all how you look at it. I wouldn't hold anything against saying something is 800p because only 800 horizontal lines were drawn on screen. If the dev is against that, then I feel they are more worried about PR than they should be.




  7. #32
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    32
    Posts
    31,382
    Rep Power
    194
    Points
    118,616 (0 Banked)
    Achievements IT'S OVER 9000!
    Quote Originally Posted by F34R View Post
    Yeah, "inaccurate" would have been a completely different post lol.

    Hmm....

    I dunno, I guess it's all how you look at it. I wouldn't hold anything against saying something is 800p because only 800 horizontal lines were drawn on screen. If the dev is against that, then I feel they are more worried about PR than they should be.
    the problem is that they should be worried about it because 800p does not really explain much because the horizontal is also important and should be more important to be honest.

    generally people use these smaller names because it's easier but if the resolution is any different from what we consider to be the norm, then it should be stated.

    a person can say, it's 720p but the horizontal lines are not 1280 but more like 1080...that's a problem and they should not have called it 720p because it's not, it's upscaled.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
vBCredits II Deluxe v2.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2010-2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.