Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst ... 313 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 431
  1. #51
    Administrator
    Lethal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas City
    PSN ID
    Lethal_NFS
    Age
    37
    Posts
    14,316
    Rep Power
    175
    The problem with all the critic reviews, is that none of them speak of this horrible screen tearing plaguing the game right now. And the huge dips in frame rate. I am starting to believe that these reviews were based off the beta, and not the game people bought in stores yesterday.....

    The user reviews are constantly mentioning these issues. And it sounds like it is some of the worst screen tearing ever seen in a video game.
    Last edited by Lethal; 03-12-2014 at 15:11.

  2. #52
    Dedicated Member
    Demi_God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Icy hot of the north
    PSN ID
    Kamikaze_Krunch
    Posts
    1,191
    Rep Power
    35
    8.0 to a 9.0 is certain a great score. EGM on the other hand is honestly a joke. This game isn't 100, certainly not and now because of such an odd score with I believe to be an agenda in mind, I'll ignore their future reviews. 8.0 seems about right I think 8 to 9 whichever so these are good scores and I can see why some people may give it a 6 or 7 if they decide to. Not because of the lack of single player campaign or anything. some people, in fact a lot don't really care for mechs. I'm one of them. I've been on the fence on this game for the PC, but I think I'll skip it because I'm not a mech fan at all, I don't like robots.

    As for the lack of screen tearing from the reviews, that is pretty odd. I wonder if they could have been paid off or they just enjoyed the game to where it didn't cross their mind?

    Some people look at a 8/10 as in, meh it's okay, but I believe the way these between 1 and 10 scores should be, 5 being average since it's the middle. But no sites do that anymore, if a game is a 7, you may not want to get it.

  3. #53
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    34,262
    Rep Power
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by Lethal View Post
    it sounds like it is some of the worst screen tearing ever seen in a video game.
    O_O i must witness this.

  4. #54
    Administrator
    Lethal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kansas City
    PSN ID
    Lethal_NFS
    Age
    37
    Posts
    14,316
    Rep Power
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by Sufi View Post
    O_O i must witness this.
    Same here. I am going to rent it today to see if this is true. But it sounds like the game needs some serious patching.

  5. #55
    Master Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In the 36 Chambers
    PSN ID
    Lymphatik
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,515
    Rep Power
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Demi_God View Post
    Some people look at a 8/10 as in, meh it's okay, but I believe the way these between 1 and 10 scores should be, 5 being average since it's the middle. But no sites do that anymore, if a game is a 7, you may not want to get it.
    That's exactly how I feel. No sites use the entire scale.


    BBK.. Tapa. Talked.

  6. #56
    Community and Technical Manager
    Christopher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, GA
    PSN ID
    Cand3Js
    Age
    46
    Posts
    11,593
    Rep Power
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by BBK.. View Post
    That's exactly how I feel. No sites use the entire scale.


    BBK.. Tapa. Talked.
    I should have tried that excuse when I was a kid in school. "But Mom.....50 is average!"












  7. #57
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    34,262
    Rep Power
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher View Post
    I should have tried that excuse when I was a kid in school. "But Mom.....50 is average!"

    didn't you get strict punishment back in the 50s for that :P

  8. #58
    Community and Technical Manager
    Christopher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, GA
    PSN ID
    Cand3Js
    Age
    46
    Posts
    11,593
    Rep Power
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Sufi View Post
    didn't you get strict punishment back in the 50s for that :P











  9. Likes GazzaGSi, Omar likes this post
  10. #59
    Master Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In the 36 Chambers
    PSN ID
    Lymphatik
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,515
    Rep Power
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher View Post
    I should have tried that excuse when I was a kid in school. "But Mom.....50 is average!"

    Ha! Yeah ok I don't think that would go down too well. Especially out of 200


    BBK.. Tapa. Talked.

  11. #60
    Great game in my opinion. Very fun and a fresh feeling.

    Now, can they hold up to when Destiny comes out?

    That's the next beast shooter coming out and a lot of people have high expectations for Destiny.

  12. #61
    Forum Guru
    K2D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    PSN ID
    Cathode
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,539
    Rep Power
    93
    Cool, cool cool. I'll try on PC I guess.





  13. #62
    Master Sage
    Two4DaMoney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    12,733
    Rep Power
    133
    I don't get how it's a mp only game and lack features found in the other big dogs of fps


  14. #63
    Veteran
    unicron7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    A little place called none of your **** business. United States.
    Age
    31
    Posts
    4,740
    Rep Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Two4DaMoney View Post
    I don't get how it's a mp only game and lack features found in the other big dogs of fps
    Apparently it's getting a free pass in these areas due it being "OMGz so much fun and 'revolutionary'." If any other franchise pulled this MP only stuff while charging $60 flat out along with DLC prices, they'd be eaten alive by the press. This just shows that when you pump money into marketing, you get serious results. Just wished they'd spent that marketing money on a single player campaign.


    I don't really need a water cooler/remote control as of right now.

  15. Likes Two4DaMoney likes this post
  16. #64
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    34,262
    Rep Power
    220
    because it's a low production game, like i said a while back. they're a small studio. but they are relying on their innovations to get them started for a sequel. which will probably blow this game out the water and might become a real contender to COD...not that this won't already be but meh...until it hits all platforms...it's not going to remotely overtake sales of COD or BF.

  17. #65
    Elite Guru
    GazzaGSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    5,388
    Rep Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by rene2kx View Post
    People bashing it for being online only or charging 60 usd for the game
    Plus people who haven't got a Live subscription will be paying for that too in order to play it. (although I think there is a 24/48 hour trial in the box?)

  18. #66
    Forum Overseer
    Omar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, TX.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    34,262
    Rep Power
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by GazzaGSi View Post
    Plus people who haven't got a Live subscription will be paying for that too in order to play it. (although I think there is a 24/48 hour trial in the box?)
    pretty small although lol.

  19. #67
    Ultimate Veteran
    mistercrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas
    PSN ID
    mistercrow
    Posts
    24,741
    Rep Power
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by Lethal View Post
    The problem with all the critic reviews, is that none of them speak of this horrible screen tearing plaguing the game right now. And the huge dips in frame rate. I am starting to believe that these reviews were based off the beta, and not the game people bought in stores yesterday..... The user reviews are constantly mentioning these issues. And it sounds like it is some of the worst screen tearing ever seen in a video game.
    Another example of why I dont rely on gaming press reviews.

  20. #68
    Elite Sage
    TidalPhoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your urinary tract
    PSN ID
    TidalPhoenix
    Posts
    12,401
    Rep Power
    140
    Yup, very surprised nobody has really mentioned the tearing. I could see it clearly when I was watching Twitch. I'll be honest and say that I didn't notice any frame rate problems with the matches I watched, but there's enough people complaining about it to know they obviously do exist. All in all I don't really think Titanfall brings much new to the table. It is a game I'd play, but not something I'd drool over and fondly recount my memories on it in years to come (like I do the original Halo for example)

    ​aka Sparc

    Entropy isn't what it used be

  21. #69
    Superior Member
    Old Man Gamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    928
    Rep Power
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by unicron7 View Post
    Apparently it's getting a free pass in these areas due it being "OMGz so much fun and 'revolutionary'." If any other franchise pulled this MP only stuff while charging $60 flat out along with DLC prices, they'd be eaten alive by the press. This just shows that when you pump money into marketing, you get serious results. Just wished they'd spent that marketing money on a single player campaign.
    I disagree. There are a lot of gamers out there that only play multi-player games. They will buy CoD and play only MP for a year until the next CoD game comes out.

    One could strongly argue that they get much more value for their $60 buy playing the hell out it for 12 months than you or I get from a 15-20 hour single player game.

    It all comes down to preference and individual taste.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

  22. #70
    Miqo'te Bard
    Yuuichi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,119
    Rep Power
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by unicron7 View Post
    Apparently it's getting a free pass in these areas due it being "OMGz so much fun and 'revolutionary'." If any other franchise pulled this MP only stuff while charging $60 flat out along with DLC prices, they'd be eaten alive by the press. This just shows that when you pump money into marketing, you get serious results. Just wished they'd spent that marketing money on a single player campaign.
    Pretty much and I knew it would f happen. MS exclusive seem to,always get byes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sufi View Post
    because it's a low production game, like i said a while back. they're a small studio. but they are relying on their innovations to get them started for a sequel. which will probably blow this game out the water and might become a real contender to COD...not that this won't already be but meh...until it hits all platforms...it's not going to remotely overtake sales of COD or BF.
    Low production is not an excuse. When I get off tap a talk I'll list you games that got torn apart for thier dlc. White,knight chronicles two first to come to mind.

  23. #71
    Community and Technical Manager
    Christopher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, GA
    PSN ID
    Cand3Js
    Age
    46
    Posts
    11,593
    Rep Power
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Yuuichi View Post
    Pretty much and I knew it would f happen. MS exclusive seem to,always get byes.
    Hmmm, wonder what the review scores for COD or BF would be right now if they were both MP only.











  24. #72
    Community and Technical Manager
    Christopher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins, GA
    PSN ID
    Cand3Js
    Age
    46
    Posts
    11,593
    Rep Power
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Yuuichi View Post
    Pretty much and I knew it would f happen. MS exclusive seem to,always get byes.
    Hmmm, wonder what the review scores for COD or BF would be right now if they were both MP only.











  25. #73
    Master Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In the 36 Chambers
    PSN ID
    Lymphatik
    Age
    27
    Posts
    12,515
    Rep Power
    117
    I wish BF was still online only.


    BBK.. Tapa. Talked.

  26. #74
    Forum Elder
    chrisw26308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Age
    45
    Posts
    2,581
    Rep Power
    93
    I hate to say it but I always call it for what it is but we did have warhawk which was multiplayer only. Scores were consistently around 8.5. Sony didn't charge full price for it though. I think it was 40. Which seems fair to me.



    Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  27. #75
    Superior Member
    Old Man Gamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    928
    Rep Power
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by BBK.. View Post
    I wish BF was still online only.


    BBK.. Tapa. Talked.
    Exactly. It would still be $60 but much better than it is now.

    Funny, but I don't recall people complaining about BF being full price when it was online only.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts