Professional Wrestling Thread

[claud3]

it is for either title he choose's and he chose the WWE title, unless he is drafted to smackdown. Then for storyline change, he will cash in for the WHC title

Or a cross brand cash in... So he cash's in for the WWE title and brings it to Smackdown and the WHC title goes to RAW

But he did say that he would combine both world titles, so one title is used on both brands...

Do not seeing a both being put into one title and not by him

[DeviousOne]

I don't like the way shit is shaping up I did enjoy seeing brock on monday

[claud3]

it is the way it is going and it sucks... The WWE needs fan input

Or just try a lot harder

[Yuuichi]

it is for either title he choose's and he chose the WWE title, unless he is drafted to smackdown. Then for storyline change, he will cash in for the WHC title

Or a cross brand cash in... So he cash's in for the WWE title and brings it to Smackdown and the WHC title goes to RAW

But he did say that he would combine both world titles, so one title is used on both brands...

Do not seeing a both being put into one title and not by him

No it is just for whc smackdown title. Ziggler is on raw currently to get built up but he is smackdown roster. Cena had wwe raw brief case and cashed it in. Ziggler can not do it for wwe title. They stoped the one brief case for any title when mitb became its own ppv.

[claud3]

ok my bad, never knew... So why did he cash in on the WWE TITLE at the 20th year of RAW

[Yuuichi]

ok my bad, never knew... So why did he cash in on the WWE TITLE at the 20th year of RAW

Maybe a opps move by writters or maybe they hope we all stupid and forget what brand the briefcase is suppose to be for.

[claud3]

Hold on, he cashed in on the bigshow and cena stopped him

[DeviousOne]

Yea he was going to and cena ruined it I was pissed!!

[claud3]

it makes no freaking sense for cena to get involved in a WHC title, were is CENA is a WWE TITLE guy

[DeviousOne]

Well it happened and now everything we knew that was gonna happen is happening smh....

[claud3]

what that CENA is entitled to screw wrestlers on both brands out of their respective world titles... That is WWE fucking bullshit right there

[XMW]

I don't see why it would matter that Ziggler has the SD MITB briefcase. This is the WWE we're talking about here. They're absolute masters in creating plotholes, leaving questions unanswered and just random fuckery.
Does nobody remember the rule where the defending champion has to be on either both knees or he needs to be standing in order for another wrestler to cash in on that guy? You probably don't, and even if you do WWE doesn't even enforce that rule anymore.

Don't believe me on WWE's plotholes and things that ended up making no sense, answer 3 of these:

- Who put the Cell back down at Hell In A Cell 2011?
- How did Mickie James ruin Beth Phoenix' life as she stated when she debuted?
- What did Mike Knox do with Evan Bourne's Slammy award? And why did he take it?
- What was Nexus' bigger picture?
- Who lifted the briefcase at King Of The Ring 1999?
- Who was the person that stepped out of the car when Rock made his return

My point is WWE often forgets parts of a storyline of angle themselves, and if they forget - or want you to forget they'll just never mention it again lol.

[DeviousOne]

I don't see why it would matter that Ziggler has the SD MITB briefcase. This is the WWE we're talking about here. They're absolute masters in creating plotholes, leaving questions unanswered and just random fuckery.
Does nobody remember the rule where the defending champion has to be on either both knees or he needs to be standing in order for another wrestler to cash in on that guy? You probably don't, and even if you do WWE doesn't even enforce that rule anymore.

Don't believe me on WWE's plotholes and things that ended up making no sense, answer 3 of these:

- Who put the Cell back down at Hell In A Cell 2011?
- How did Mickie James ruin Beth Phoenix' life as she stated when she debuted?
- What did Mike Knox do with Evan Bourne's Slammy award? And why did he take it?
- What was Nexus' bigger picture?
- Who lifted the briefcase at King Of The Ring 1999?
- Who was the person that stepped out of the car when Rock made his return

My point is WWE often forgets parts of a storyline of angle themselves, and if they forget - or want you to forget they'll just never mention it again lol.

Great points lmao.....

Wwe writers think we're idiots

[XMW]

Great points lmao.....

Wwe writers think we're idiots

To be fair though, alot of fans are idiots.

Oh btw just remembered about this one "Who lifted the briefcase at King Of The Ring 1999?" it was never revealed who it was but the only person who would've been logical (or fit into that scenario) would be The Big Boss Man.
They did a storyline leading up to the show where the Boss Man was fired from the Corporate Ministry. As it turned out, no Corporate Ministry members could interfere during the Austin vs Vince/Shane McMahon ladder match for control of the company (although who owned what would delve into a headache as Stephanie and Linda were back with each quarter control of the company, despite Vince and Shane having 50/50 control each due to winning the match but that’s Russo for you). The briefcase was raised and Boss Man was back in the Corporation after that.

[claud3]

The WWE has a mindset off, they will never find out and if they do

Then we will throw in another bit of the story too reduce the plot-holes, so they feel they are getting the whole story...

This Ziggler thing is so freaking stupid... Plus does anyone actually cares if he gets the WHC title. I do not even watch smackdown and do not even care who has the WHC title

[Molo316]

I don't see why it would matter that Ziggler has the SD MITB briefcase. This is the WWE we're talking about here. They're absolute masters in creating plotholes, leaving questions unanswered and just random fuckery.
Does nobody remember the rule where the defending champion has to be on either both knees or he needs to be standing in order for another wrestler to cash in on that guy? You probably don't, and even if you do WWE doesn't even enforce that rule anymore.

Don't believe me on WWE's plotholes and things that ended up making no sense, answer 3 of these:

- Who put the Cell back down at Hell In A Cell 2011?
- How did Mickie James ruin Beth Phoenix' life as she stated when she debuted?
- What did Mike Knox do with Evan Bourne's Slammy award? And why did he take it?
- What was Nexus' bigger picture?
- Who lifted the briefcase at King Of The Ring 1999?
- Who was the person that stepped out of the car when Rock made his return

My point is WWE often forgets parts of a storyline of angle themselves, and if they forget - or want you to forget they'll just never mention it again lol.

Brilliant!

I'd like to add "Who lowered the cage on Raw in 1999 when Stone Cold got bailed out of jail by Vince McMahon to return and face Triple H for the WWF title?" if I may.

[nextgen3]

The writes suck at raw an very well at smackdown! sorry its my opnion, they need better writes an why cant they write a story out first before moving in to change mode so quickly! i understand there can be injurys during storylines an superstars may be out for a few months but tbh they need a back up plan to go with-in that storyline in the first place without having to do it last bloody minute.

[claud3]

Some big change in the WWE house

WWE has hired Monty Sarhan as General Counsel and Senior Vice President. WWE Studios head Michael Luisi was previously in the role. Sarhan takes over and will report directly to WWE CEO Vince McMahon. Sarhan's WWE role will be "overseeing the legal and business affairs of the company and serving as the principal legal advisor to the Chairman, CFO, and management team." Sarhan will also serve as "Corporate Secretary" toWWE's Board of Directors.

This is a really big deal... This means things will shift around and a new direction for certain parts of the WWE, hopefully in great ways

[DeviousOne]

Its a possibility we all know at the end of the day Vince is the filter so nothing may change?

[Yuuichi]

So TNA is going on the road permanently. This is what will kill the company.

[Molo316]

So TNA is going on the road permanently. This is what will kill the company.

Is that what the big announcement was then? I read that they hadn't released any taping dates for after the UK tour, and they usually released them months before they happen.

[DeviousOne]

So TNA is going on the road permanently. This is what will kill the company.

Well no more free shows for me to go too =(

[claud3]

they are doing what the WWE did, back in the day

The difference is, that the WWE actually got the better deal back then... I do see TNA doing ok on state by state tour, but not on the the level off the WWE

unless that is there true aim

[nextgen3]

So TNA is going on the road permanently. This is what will kill the company.

That was the BIG announcement!! well that sucks lol i dont watch alot of TNA but i kinda follow whats going on!

[DeviousOne]

So now they are going to be filming there shows from hs gyms and clubs? Smh they are too small to be traveling lol