Call of Duty 4 Ultimate Hands On Edition
- Posted October 16th, 2007 at 15:43 EDT by
- 18,583 views
- 32 Comments
(continued from previous page) ...Duty 4 holds it's own against all other first person shooters out there, and you would be missing out on what may potentially turn out to be the best game of the year if you fail to pick up a copy.
For more information on Call of Duty 4's multiplayer read our other Hands On preview, where we cover both the online multiplayer beta and our first look impressions.
Stay tuned for a full review next month.
- Page 1
- Page 2
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
DeadOnArrival06
- 4:28pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 6
No limited edition and not as smooth as 360!? WTF?!!!!!?!??! I'm getting incredibly sick and tired of this all the time!
-
-
-
Mecha_Daddy
- 4:53pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 9
This game just took a step down on my radar. They probably just ported it over to the PS3.
-
sony4life
- 4:57pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 10
i dont like the fact that most games on the ps3 lacks of on graphics whats up with that. I have never heard about the xbox 360 games having a bad graphics. Why is that SONY? i thought ps3 was suppose to be the next GEN of gaming meaning that gaming will be like no other and will look soo realistic but it seems like its not like the next GEN...step up your game sony! I know you workin hard and all but come on NEXT GEN means nothing you seen before and if isnt gonna be dat than dont call it next GEN of gaming because when people hear dat they think its going to be a nice experince and want to buy it.......WHO AGREES WITH ME
-
XSpike_SpiegelC
- 4:58pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 11
what happend to the promise of both versions exactly the same?!? GO HAZE!!!
-
alchemyuser1
- 5:02pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 12
I will definetely be picking this up just hope I can use cover like the enemies do
-
Algonath
- 5:05pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 13
lazy developers, the PS3 version has awesome graphics, running on a great 60fps but has abit of jaggies on it ONLY because the devs never had the the new SN 2.0 tools. If they had those new tools that Sony finally provided for free. Then...yea lol you get. Xbox 360 and Wii are such CHEAP consoles, its so EASY making games run smooth on them. Now that we have the new SN tools free for all devs and especially those lazy devs. We be getting nonstop high quality games like always. So Microsoft can just cry themselvs to sleep! lol :D
-
-
-
Organic_Shadow
- 5:51pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 16
I thought IW said that the 360 and PS3 versions would be identical? No LE love either. Such hatred.
-
scarriface
- 6:08pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 17
we dont need that info man people want to play the game and discover any new stuff by themselfl keep it to yourself dont ruing the hype..
-
bungledude
- 6:44pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 18
Repeat,this is a recording.Maybe all PS3 owners should just ban buying ported games until these Devs and Sony get their act together.Not going to happen is it?We'll just take it on the chin like we always do and then just keep buying them.What message are we sending if we don't take a harder stand on this bull?By the way,I'm going to buy COD 4 for my PS3.LMAO.I don't really have a choice.
-
-
-
Vaughn
- 9:34pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 21
U guys are mistaking graphics with jaggyness... They didnt say anything was wrong with the graphics just maybe in certain spots the game may have like a tad of lag, its something that shouldnt really affect you when u play but still no excuse for it being there. Im assuming because this game was prob ported and atm ps3 is kinda hard to work with for most devs that this is the reason why not totally lazy devs but something also I know if they try they can avoid. Also future games should be less problems since sony just relased SN 2.0 tools to make it easier for them.
-
Lithgow
- 10:12pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 22
I was originally planning on buying this...and now I'm not. No way in hel.l. There is absolutely no reason by now developers shouldn't be making a game, especially a massively anticipated game like this, run optimal for both systems. And if was running optimal on both systems, the PS3 version should be 2 times better since the PS3s hardware kicks as.s. Developers in general are starting to get past the point that "it's harder to develop for." It seems like a multi million dollar corporations like Activision and Infinity Ward would be the first to get it right, but obviously not. I'm holding off on this one, I won't support lazy developers in the least. Other multiplatform games that are actually taking advantage of the PS3s hardware to run better on the PS3 *cough* Assassin's Creed*cough* I will actually be supporting. Other than that I have about 5 games I'm getting before 2008. Can't wait. I'm just goona put this one on the trash list.
-
Volomon
- 10:45pm BST - October 16th, 2007
- 23
May find some jaggies on the PS3 version...not as smooth in some areas as you may find on the PC or Xbox 360.
Whats with the "May"s what kind of writer/author/journalist writes may. Do you, or do you not know. You can't put a CON it might be worse in graphics, it might be a little lagger, it might have freaking wings too.
What kind of crappy writing is that? Btw to the idiot above that doesn't know jaggies means a graphicly poor texture base which shows a jaggy line as in no antianalizing, except what doesn't make sense is the devs themselves said AA is in for both Xbox and PS3. So jaggies would be the same for both. I hope nobody lets anyone from this site play a game again. Poor article in length or detail.
Everyone else has said they were equal or PS3 is better.
http://www.dailygame.net/news/archives/006696.php
Thats what a professional article looks like no MAYBEs, cause I'm starting to think this guy MAYBE didn't actually play the game. Maybe doesn't know what hes talking about.
-
-
PS3-The Ultimate Machine
- 2:43am BST - October 17th, 2007
- 25
So once again ps3 owners are misguided and given the shaft.I thought that the ps3 version was supposed to be superior.Jaggies?WTF this is supposed to be the next generation of gaming.
-
richkaos
- 7:19am BST - October 17th, 2007
- 26
IF the writer of this article is correct, and the PS3 version does contain the odd jaggy area, then it is down to the developers "that will do" atttiude which to be honest in this day and age JUST WONT do. Fair enough by the sounds of it the reviewer is being very picky and I doubt that it will impede the game in any way but its there, and it shouldnt be.
Ive said it before and i will a million times again. If it wasnt for Sony and their playstation franchise pretty much all games developers wouldnt be half as wealthy as they are. Sony have sold Millions and I mean Millions of games over the last 15 odd years making developers and publishers very rich. So what do these developers now do to repay them? thats right! make half hearted ports for all their loyal fans some of which have supported them for the last 15 years. -
Paranoimia
- 7:25am BST - October 17th, 2007
- 27
I've come to the conclusion that half the people who use this site can't read!
It says there are SOME jaggies on RARE occasions on DISTANT objects - otherwise the game is identical. And in terms of gameplay, it is identical to the 360 version - just as fast and smooth.
The 360's graphics are by ATI, while the PS3's are by nVidia. ATI have for some time had the edge over nVidia when it comes to anti-aliasing. It's exactly the same with their PC graphics cards.
This game IS NOT a 360 port, and has been developed for the PS3 - hence the online has been built especially so that the PS3 version enjoys the same functionality as the 360 gets on Live.
Jesus, try actually READING what is in front of you! You know, just for a change.
-
TKC-Muzzer
- 3:01pm BST - October 17th, 2007
- 28
Take it as it is, other sites (neutral) say the PS3 version looks slighlty better but runs identically to the 360 version. I doubt the guy here played both versions at the same time to compare graphics/framerates.
A lot of you are assuming he played both versions , plus remeber they would not have been final buils, wait and see, it's one persons opinion which differs from what others have written.
He says " as you may find on the 360" giving the impression he has not played the single player on the 360.
-
-
-
FlyinGShoosteR43252
- 11:34pm GMT - March 1st, 2008
- 31
www.YourPS34free.com/index.php?ref=4755645 This link will guide you through the EASY process of getting a brand new retail Playstation 3! Here is how it works! First and foremost this is NOT like those other offers you see all over the web, where you are required to sign up for a million "free" offers that end up taking forever and costing you a bunch of money and a headache. You click this link and sign up for their referral program. With this program you are required to participate in only ONE of their sponsor's offers, the one I chose was the yahoo success kit, which only cost $1.95! That’s all I have paid so far! Once you sign up for your ONE required offer you use the link they provide you and post it on forums, or send it to friends, and if someone uses that link to sign up and complete one offer of their own, you get a referral. Here is the cost breakdown of the referral system. 8 Referrals = New retail 40gb PS3 10 Referrals = New retail 60gb PS3 14 Referrals = New retail 80gb Ps3 and two games YOU CHOSE (includes new releases like Uncharted: Drake's Fortune or Ratchet and Clank Future etc…) Plus many more PS3 offers and others including up to $475 in CASH I have been a member for 3 days and have 10 completed referrals on my account, well on my way to my chosen 14 (Already enough for a 60gb or 40gb PS3). I also have 250 people, who have signed up; if any 4 of them complete an offer I have my Ps3 and two games. It can take up to 3 days for a completed offer to process, so I may have already reached my goal. The company even covers shipping and handling so there is no hidden costs of ANY KIND. This website even has you create an account so you can track your progress the entire way through, and once your package ships, they supply a UPS tracking link. It is extremely user friendly I recommend you research this company online, as they are proven legitimate and not in any way a scam. EGM magazine actually did a story on them 2 years ago to see if they were legit and did in fact get a free system, so they proved it worked! The way it is possible is these sponsor's pay this company money for referring people to them, and using a portion of that money, buy you a PS3 as an incentive for helping them advertise. It is a pretty nice scheme, but it results in me getting something for free so I don't care. This will be my third free thing to get from this company; I have a 360 elite and iPhone for the cost of about 5 dollars. Enjoy your free system, free isn't a bad deal for a great console and a Blu-Ray player! www.YourPS34free.com/index.php?ref=4755645
-
Advertisement