Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    PS3 chip diagrams (CPU+GPU) from 2002-2004 - Patents by Masakazu Suzuoki - SCEI

    This was the original CELL-based chipset (2 separate dies) for PS3:

    "Broadband Engine" (CPU) and "Visualizer" (GPU)

    You'll notice the Broadband Engine CPU chip had 4 Processor Elements. The finished Cell for PS3 had just 1 beefier Processor Element.

    Each Processor Element had a PowerPC-based "PU" which later became the PPE, as well as 8 APUs which later became the SPEs.

    The "Visualizer" GPU contained 4 cut-down Processor/Visualizer Elements, each with a smaller/weaker PowerPC-based "PU" / PPE, plus 4 APUs / SPEs. In addition, within each Processor/Visualizer Element, there was a
    Pixel Engine, most likely containing multiple pixel/raster pipelines (in modern GPUs these are the ROPs), as well as an Image Cache (embedded VRAM/DRAM of some sort) as well as a CRTC (Cathode Ray Tube Controller).

    The entire 2-chip CELL-based Broadband Engine CPU and CELL-based Visualizer GPU made use of 64 MB of embedded DRAM to massively speed-up communications within the CPU and GPU (and perhaps between the 2 chips as well?). This of course would've massively reduced the burden of the main external RAM (Rambus Yellowstone aka XDR) it would've had, be it 256 or 512 MB.

    All the patents and diagrams related to the CELL CPU and CELL GPU by SCEI's Masakazu Suzuoki can be found here:

    There was also a massive thread on all of this, on Beyond3D, here:

    Obviously the Visualizer GPU was scrapped. SCEI went to Nvidia. Together they developed the RSX / Reality Synthesizer GPU. It was based on Nvidia's NV47 / G70 / G71 GPU, used in the GeForce 7800 series. As many know the RSX for PS3 was a custom, cut-down version of NV47 / G70 / G71 / GeForce 7800. The PS3 version had half the pixel pipelines / ROPs (8 instead of the full 16) as well as half the memory bus width (128-Bit instead of 256-Bit.

    I often wondered what the PS3 based on the full 2002-2004 2-chip CELL-based (CPU + GPU) chipset would've been capable of compared to the final PS3 that was released in 2006.

    Well, there's no doubt that the soon-to-arrive PS4 will be superior to even the most powerful PS3 concept
    Last edited by parallax scroll; 09-10-2013 at 21:01.

  2. #2
    Elite Member
    Syphon_Filter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Canada, Toronto
    PSN ID
    Rep Power
    I didn't understand anything but I think its cool.

    CPU I7 3820 GPU Asus GTX 980 4GB Motherboard BioStar TpowerX79 HDD Seagate 3TB CPU Samsung SSD 850 EVO 512GB COOLING: Corsair Hydro H80 Case: CoolerMaster RC932 Haf RAM: 16GB 1333 DDR3 Power Supply Seasonic 760W Windows 7 64Bit Monitor BENQ XL2730Z 2560X1440 Samsung 3D LED TV 240HZ 55H7150 PS3 Super Slim 1TB HDD PS VITA 32GB

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Syphon_Filter View Post
    I didn't understand anything but I think its cool.

    It's just about some of Sony's original plans for a far more powerful PS3 than the PS3 that came out in 2006.

  4. #4
    Supreme Veteran
    keefy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    The Sock Gap
    PSN ID
    Rep Power
    More powerful? I assume it would have cost a lot more as well.

  5. #5
    Power Member
    Vulgotha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Rep Power
    It'd have been wildly impractical. They ditched the idea because the Cell itself could not compete with a GPU.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts