Internet slut would you hit that?

AJJets

Dedicated Member
Jan 4, 2006
1,005
0
0
27
#1
MOST women surf the internet for clothes, shoes and bargains. Not Louise Grant. She scours the web for sex with total STRANGERS.

The 25-year-old bar manager is hooked on net sex and has slept with 200 online date mates.
On average, she beds a different man every FIVE DAYS. She's even had sex with THREE of them in ONE DAY.
Louise claims to be driven by the "thrill" of no-strings sex with guys she's just met.
She admits: "I can't explain the buzz I get from meeting someone for the first time and knowing that in a couple of hours we'll be ripping each other's clothes off. It's addictive.
"A lot of women may call me a slag, but I'm not. The sex is on my terms - I call the shots."
And despite not knowing what creep may lurk behind a profile picture, Louise reckons her cyber bed-hopping is SAFER than conventional dating.
Risky

"My friends will meet guys in clubs and take them home," she argues. "That's more risky than what I do because I can check mine out before we meet.
"I'll always insist on safe sex and carry condoms. If the guy complains, I won't meet him."
Louise, from Manchester, first started using the internet for sex after splitting with her fiancé three years ago.
Feeling lonely, she looked up an ex on Facebook. The next day they went out for drinks followed by sex.
Louise says: "I missed sex so much. We shared some wine and got a bit flirty - we knew we'd end up in bed together.
"When I left in the morning, it was refreshing just to kiss him goodbye and not worry about if he would call."
Buzzing from her night of passion, Louise went straight online to sign up to an adult dating site, passion.com, where she could meet other guys for no-strings sex.
Her first ad read: "Hi. I'm outgoing with a naughty side I want to explore. If you'd like to know more, drop me a line."
And it wasn't long before ahe was bombarded with messages - and gross pictures-from fellas who were desperate to "meet" her.
"I'm not model material," admits Louise. "But I couldn't believe how good-looking the blokes were. It's such a thrill knowing all these guys want me.
"I checked the first man out on Facebook before we met. I also promised a friend I'd call her during the date." Louise describes how the two met, had some wine and went back to her place: "He asked what I liked - so I told him exactly what I wanted.
"You can be totally uninhibited and not worry about being judged. Afterwards, he thanked me and said he'd see me soon. I was hooked."
Louise quickly joined two other sex sites - be naughty.com and plentyoffish. com - and now rushes home from work every day to check her emails.
She recalls: "In the first month I met four guys and now meet around two a week. I've not counted but I must have slept with nearly 200 men.
"I remember meeting three guys in one day. The first was Paul at the Hilton Hotel in Manchester. We had an amazing night of sex and again in the morning. By lunch I'd met up with Chris, who was into swinging."
And for dinner? Maneater Louise still wasn't satisfied.
"He was in his mid-40s," she says. "A George Clooney lookalike. He was handsome, rich and knew how to treat a woman."
But she claims her most exciting encounter was when she indulged in kinky role play.
Louise says: "I acted out a sexy boss fantasy for a guy called Adam. I was wearing lingerie and high heels. I interviewed him before he grabbed me and told me to strip - it drove us both wild!
"Another guy I see loves giving women oral sex. He'll come round to my flat just for that."
But Louise saw the ugly side of net sex when she naively met a man without checking him out first. She says: "His profile pic looked nice but he was a total loser. He smoked cheap cigs, stunk and ate like a pig at dinner." She made a quick exit.
Last year, 5.6 million singletons went on over 13 million internet first dates. Less than half of them led to one- night stands.
Louise reveals: "I've met married men, IT geeks and a few plumbers.
"I hear pals moan about their partners and thank my lucky stars I don't have to put up with snoring, pants lying around or getting dinner ready.
"When I have a date, I put on sexy undies, drink wine with a gorgeous guy who takes me home and ravishes me.
"I'll settle down one day but it's too much fun at the moment."
INTERNET SEX: SAFE OR SINFUL?

CATHERINE TOWNSEND, FABULOUS MAGAZINE'S SEX & RELATIONSHIPS EXPERT, SAYS ...
Louise is having fun meeting guys on the net . . . and good for her. This is the future of relationships - whether it's for no-strings sex or to meet someone for the long term.
The excitement of doing it this way is you can reject all those you don't want straight away and go for the good stuff.
Lots of my friends meet men this way and they use the pics of guys like trading cards. There's no harm in what Louise is doing as long as she's very careful. Meet the guy in a public place and tell friends where you are.
JANE BUTTERWORTH, NEWS OF THE WORLD AGONY AUNT, SAYS ...
What Louise is doing could be storing up trouble for the future.
She admits it is highly addictive, that she gets a buzz. In effect, she is using sex like a drug. Just as a junkie uses heroin to give themselves a short-term high or wipe out painful feelings, a sex addict uses the excitement of passion for similar reasons.
Any addiction is bad news because it eventually ends up controlling you. When that happens, it is hard to stop.
One day, says Louise, she wants to settle down, but how will her future partner view her sexual history?
Link: http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/new...after-surfing-web-for-sex-with-strangers.html
 

richie217

Power Overwhelming
Dec 10, 2008
3,002
0
36
36
#4
Can't say the idea of sleeping with a slag interests me to much. Lets say she has slept with 200 guys. Condoms I think are allowed to have a failure rate of up to around 4% roughly. That means she has practically had unprotected sex with 8 men. When 1 in 9 sexual active adults has HSV-2 it's only a matter of time until this nasty skank ends up with something.

Not prepared to play russian roullete with my *****.
 
K

Kael

Guest
#5
[QUOTE="richie217, post: 0]Can't say the idea of sleeping with a slag interests me to much. Lets say she has slept with 200 guys. Condoms I think are allowed to have a failure rate of up to around 4% roughly. That means she has practically had unprotected sex with 8 men. When 1 in 9 sexual active adults has HSV-2 it's only a matter of time until this nasty skank ends up with something.

Not prepared to play russian roullete with my *****.[/quote]



Well you certainly know your math, lol !


OT: I'd hit it. IN THE MOUTH.
 
Aug 22, 2006
14,316
79
0
Alone in the Cold
#6
[QUOTE="richie217, post: 0]Can't say the idea of sleeping with a slag interests me to much. Lets say she has slept with 200 guys. Condoms I think are allowed to have a failure rate of up to around 4% roughly. That means she has practically had unprotected sex with 8 men. When 1 in 9 sexual active adults has HSV-2 it's only a matter of time until this nasty skank ends up with something.

Not prepared to play russian roullete with my *****.[/quote]

Newest study shows that 17% people using condoms for a year get pregnant.
Not sure how to factor in how many partners you are with but that number is too high imo.
 

Ryuuchi10

Superior Member
Aug 1, 2008
948
0
0
31
www.myspace.com
#9
Well she is beautiful that's one thing but I don't think I would just go for her body just for a reason like that. I bet her personality is good but not great. A woman who just want to have fun like that is not my cup of tea. It'll be trouble for her if she decided to settle with a right guy.

I would say that I rather go for girls who aren't much like her but I think I'm contradicting myself somehow by saying that.
 
S

silvermanor

Guest
#10
Wow that is one selfish ***** lol. I wouldnt be able to put up with the "me me me" attitude. No thanks. I can do better.
 

richie217

Power Overwhelming
Dec 10, 2008
3,002
0
36
36
#12
[QUOTE="Kael, post: 0]Well you certainly know your math, lol !


OT: I'd hit it. IN THE MOUTH.[/quote]

You can still catch certain STI's even from recieving oral sex. Or were you using your fist to hit it :confused:


[QUOTE="UberNerD20, post: 0]
[/quote]

Or the boots that Duke wears to walk in acid.

[QUOTE="rmac694203, post: 0]Me me me attitude? All you gotta do it hit it and run. No strings attached.

I'm married, so when I say I'd hit it, I mean figuratively.[/quote]

:snicker
 

WaspMonkey

Forum Elder
Aug 16, 2007
2,746
0
0
39
#20
[QUOTE="richie217, post: 0]Can't say the idea of sleeping with a slag interests me to much. Lets say she has slept with 200 guys. Condoms I think are allowed to have a failure rate of up to around 4% roughly. That means she has practically had unprotected sex with 8 men. When 1 in 9 sexual active adults has HSV-2 it's only a matter of time until this nasty skank ends up with something.

Not prepared to play russian roullete with my *****.[/quote]

Actually your stats are wrong. Think of it this way. Say you flip a coin. You have a 50/50 chance of getting heads or tails. Lets say you flip it ten times and you get ten heads. Your odds are going up for getting a tails right? Nope. Everytime you toss the coin it's still a 50/50 chance. Condoms are 99% safe. If you have sex 100 times with a condom that doesn't mean that at least one of those times it broke. Everytime you use a condom it's still 99%.

Given this I would definitely hit. :snicker
 

richie217

Power Overwhelming
Dec 10, 2008
3,002
0
36
36
#22
[QUOTE="WaspMonkey, post: 0]Actually your stats are wrong. Think of it this way. Say you flip a coin. You have a 50/50 chance of getting heads or tails. Lets say you flip it ten times and you get ten heads. Your odds are going up for getting a tails right? Nope. Everytime you toss the coin it's still a 50/50 chance. Condoms are 99% safe. If you have sex 100 times with a condom that doesn't mean that at least one of those times it broke. Everytime you use a condom it's still 99%.

Given this I would definitely hit. :snicker[/quote]

Yeah I understand this. But if you continously roll the dice eventually you are gonna crap out. I still would not be taking my chances with this ho.
 
Oct 2, 2006
2,983
0
0
30
#23
[QUOTE="WaspMonkey, post: 0]Actually your stats are wrong. Think of it this way. Say you flip a coin. You have a 50/50 chance of getting heads or tails. Lets say you flip it ten times and you get ten heads. Your odds are going up for getting a tails right? Nope. Everytime you toss the coin it's still a 50/50 chance. Condoms are 99% safe. If you have sex 100 times with a condom that doesn't mean that at least one of those times it broke. Everytime you use a condom it's still 99%.

Given this I would definitely hit. :snicker[/quote]Using the proper distribution, the actual chance of getting the STD (assuming that condoms are 99% effective) are:

From having sex 100 times: 63.4%
From having sex 200 times: 86.6%


So yeah, the odds still are pretty good that you will get it.

In case you are wondering how I calculated it:
1- (99/100)^n, where n is the number of times sex has taken place.
 

WaspMonkey

Forum Elder
Aug 16, 2007
2,746
0
0
39
#24
[QUOTE="Lionel Hutz, post: 0]Using the proper distribution, the actual chance of getting the STD (assuming that condoms are 99% effective) are:

From having sex 100 times: 63.4%
From having sex 200 times: 86.6%


So yeah, the odds still are pretty good that you will get it.

In case you are wondering how I calculated it:
1- (99/100)^n, where n is the number of times sex has taken place.[/quote]

I have to disagree. It seems you are stating that it the number of usage times effects the overall failure rate. However, every time you use a condom you begin again with the 99% rate. It would be different if you are using the same condom over and over again as the failure rate would continue to increase, but that's not the case.....I hope :???:
 
Jul 10, 2008
4,191
0
0
35
#25
[QUOTE="WaspMonkey, post: 0]I have to disagree. It seems you are stating that it the number of usage times effects the overall failure rate. However, every time you use a condom you begin again with the 99% rate. It would be different if you are using the same condom over and over again as the failure rate would continue to increase, but that's not the case.....I hope :???:[/quote]

well, using a binomial distribution give this kind of result, the same kind that is used to «predict» coin tosses. Although mathematically it is very sound, I am not sure it can be that accurate for cases where probabilities as high as 99% are involved. I can't really remember but there might be a better distribution to use.
 
Oct 2, 2006
2,983
0
0
30
#26
[QUOTE="WaspMonkey, post: 0]I have to disagree. It seems you are stating that it the number of usage times effects the overall failure rate. However, every time you use a condom you begin again with the 99% rate. It would be different if you are using the same condom over and over again as the failure rate would continue to increase, but that's not the case.....I hope :???:[/quote]My analysis was correct - it's a simple Binomial Distribution.

Think of it this way:
In order NOT to get the STD, you have to hit 99/100, one-hundred times in a row. This means (99/100) x (99/100) x (99/100) ....

There are a total of 100 iterations. In mathematical terms, (99/100)^100.

Now, the result is the probability that you WON'T get the STD. The result is 36.6%. So to calculate the chance that you WILL get the disease is simply 100-36.6 = 63.4%

EDIT - beaten to it by Boulayman above me. :)

As for a better distribution, it is likely that one exists. However, I think for our purposes of this discussion - simply to show that it is likely that an STD transfer will occur with 100+ sexual acts with a condom (assuming of course that the person has the STD before the first act) - it will suffice.