Loving it so far, are all shooters now-a-days generic? Its not just that its a shooter, its the story, characters and so forth that makes these all the same shooter different or at least anything thats not cod. IG seems to have really went for an almost kz2 style look, or at least to me.
Last edited:
I am not sure why people who didn't like the first two games get themselves to believe they will like the third game of a series. I liked what I saw and they are bringing back what I liked from the first game --- so awesome!
Likes:
TheBreezyBB
[QUOTE="streetracer67856, post: 5309835]The motion blur looks great, probably the thing that sticks out the most to me in the trailer, makes for a really realistic look. Doesn't look like a buy for me as Killzone 3 is gonna be sick, but it looks good enough I guess..[/QUOTE]
Dude... KZ3 is at the start of the year, and R3 at the end, you have enough time gap to enjoy both
Dude... KZ3 is at the start of the year, and R3 at the end, you have enough time gap to enjoy both
Agreed with RedOrb and Rapture.
[QUOTE="Daggers21, post: 5309617]Loving it so far, are all shooters now-a-days generic? Its not just that its a shooter, its the story, characters and so forth that makes these all the same shooter different or at least anything thats not cod. IG seems to have really went for an almost kz2 style look, or at least to me.[/QUOTE]And this trailer didn't give us any indication about either. So I basically have to look up articles to go find out anything.
[QUOTE="radgamer420, post: 5309815]The blood splatter looked amazing but the rest of the graphics didnt look very good imo. The graphics engine doesn't look like its been updated and improved at all. However it does look like it will be fun to play.[/QUOTE]In a nutshell. Hopefully it will be fun, I do want to enjoy this game I'm just not getting any from it so far. Insomniac needs to spill some beans on more than a couple gameplay snip-its.
[QUOTE="Daggers21, post: 5309617]Loving it so far, are all shooters now-a-days generic? Its not just that its a shooter, its the story, characters and so forth that makes these all the same shooter different or at least anything thats not cod. IG seems to have really went for an almost kz2 style look, or at least to me.[/QUOTE]And this trailer didn't give us any indication about either. So I basically have to look up articles to go find out anything.
[QUOTE="radgamer420, post: 5309815]The blood splatter looked amazing but the rest of the graphics didnt look very good imo. The graphics engine doesn't look like its been updated and improved at all. However it does look like it will be fun to play.[/QUOTE]In a nutshell. Hopefully it will be fun, I do want to enjoy this game I'm just not getting any from it so far. Insomniac needs to spill some beans on more than a couple gameplay snip-its.
[QUOTE="RedOrb_Collector, post: 5309871]The more or I look at it, the more inexplicably angry I grow.
WTF Insomniac,WHY are you guys such lightweights with the PS3 compared to all the other big names? Why?[/QUOTE]
Are you referring to the visuals? Are they that important to you?
Insomniac also provides fun gameplay, interesting stories, and great value. And the visuals will be good enough.
WTF Insomniac,WHY are you guys such lightweights with the PS3 compared to all the other big names? Why?[/QUOTE]
Are you referring to the visuals? Are they that important to you?
Insomniac also provides fun gameplay, interesting stories, and great value. And the visuals will be good enough.
I am referring to the technical side yes.
And yeah this gen has made me a graphics whore inexplicably, at least for some genres. I could forgive it if it was a genre/concept I really loved, (Demons Souls looks average to good but I love it) but with shooters I demand the best graphics possible.
Never been impressed with shooter stories so they should at least be able to impress with visuals. Fun factor for shooters for me is derived in great part by the visuals, so they aren't mutually exclusive.
Had a ton of fun with KZ2, had no fun at all with Resistance 2.
And yeah this gen has made me a graphics whore inexplicably, at least for some genres. I could forgive it if it was a genre/concept I really loved, (Demons Souls looks average to good but I love it) but with shooters I demand the best graphics possible.
Never been impressed with shooter stories so they should at least be able to impress with visuals. Fun factor for shooters for me is derived in great part by the visuals, so they aren't mutually exclusive.
Had a ton of fun with KZ2, had no fun at all with Resistance 2.
[QUOTE="Ixion, post: 5309875]Are you referring to the visuals? Are they that important to you?
Insomniac also provides fun gameplay, interesting stories, and great value. And the visuals will be good enough.[/QUOTE]
Well said.
Some of you guys do realize that you're not going to like EVERY game that is set to release for the PS3?
If for some odd reason (IMO) you're not finding Resistance 3 appealing, stop blaming the game or Insomniac. It could just be YOU and even if that is not the case -- it's okay that you don't like it or weren't impressed by it. You'll find a different game to take it's place. There are plenty other games out there...
I've enjoyed the series since the day I played it. (I still prefer Uncharted over it but when it comes to FPS -- Resistance is the series I like.)
EDIT:
....well then, this game does not meet that criteria of yours, so I would have to say that it's just you. There is Killzone 3 to take it's place.
Insomniac also provides fun gameplay, interesting stories, and great value. And the visuals will be good enough.[/QUOTE]
Well said.
Some of you guys do realize that you're not going to like EVERY game that is set to release for the PS3?
If for some odd reason (IMO) you're not finding Resistance 3 appealing, stop blaming the game or Insomniac. It could just be YOU and even if that is not the case -- it's okay that you don't like it or weren't impressed by it. You'll find a different game to take it's place. There are plenty other games out there...
I've enjoyed the series since the day I played it. (I still prefer Uncharted over it but when it comes to FPS -- Resistance is the series I like.)
EDIT:
....well then, this game does not meet that criteria of yours, so I would have to say that it's just you. There is Killzone 3 to take it's place.
Last edited:
[QUOTE="Ixion, post: 5309875]Are you referring to the visuals? Are they that important to you?
Insomniac also provides fun gameplay, interesting stories, and great value. And the visuals will be good enough.[/QUOTE]R2, not so much. Also the story is losing my attention, this looks like R2 all over again unless there's some big difference I don't know of. It doesn't help that they're changing the protagonist on the 3rd game which makes it hard to really dig into this.
Insomniac also provides fun gameplay, interesting stories, and great value. And the visuals will be good enough.[/QUOTE]R2, not so much. Also the story is losing my attention, this looks like R2 all over again unless there's some big difference I don't know of. It doesn't help that they're changing the protagonist on the 3rd game which makes it hard to really dig into this.
Last edited:
[QUOTE="RedOrb_Collector, post: 5309871]The more or I look at it, the more inexplicably angry I grow.
WTF Insomniac,WHY are you guys such lightweights with the PS3 compared to all the other big names? Why?
Guerilla Games
Santa Monica
Naughty Dog
Polyphony
Team Ico
Sucker Punch
You guys are below all of them.[/QUOTE]
ok, where to start with this...
First...Upon release of R3 in September...
Insomniac- 6 PS3 games (with a 7th, Ratchet All4one in development)
Guerilla Games - 2 games
Santa Monica - 1 game
Naughty Dog - 2 games (3rd in november)
Polyphony- 1 1/2 games
Team Ico- ZERO games
Sucker Punch- 1 game (2nd scheduled for " sometime in 2011")
Insomniac was able to get a ROCK SOLID performing game (Resistance 1) ready for launch...where was GG, SM, ND, PD, Ico, SP with their games at the PS3's launch??...oh yeah still cooking, while Insomniac (3rd party dev) was carrying the console for the first 6 months of its existence...
Insomniac's Resistance games have not been the most pure beautiful games this generation, but from a technical standpoint they have been ROCK SOLID...no framerate issues, not jaggy messes, damn good lighting solutions (R2), and they have all up to this point ran at a solid 60fps...
The Ratchet games are amazing looking, obviously not "realistic" but awesome in that Pixar type sense...and again...technically rock solid...
GG - arguably the best looking FPS game still to this day...small scale, only 30fps, and not rock steady...
ND - arguably still the best looking game period...small scale, only 30fps
SM - arguably the best looking game period...great scale...variable frame rate...
PD - best looking racing game...some AA issues...ok framerate (at best) great lighting, TERRIBLE shadow effects
Ico - are you kidding me? what have these guys done other than throw together some boring as hell trailers? until they actually release a game...they don't belong in the same sentence as Insomniac
SP - good looking game, not ground breaking, jaggy fest...
these games all may look better than the Resistance games when taken at face value...but NONE of them (outside of maybe UC2 and that is half the frame rate) run as smoothly with as few issues as the Resistance games...
i actually take offense that you would try and say Team Ico are above Insomniac...dudes have not made a game since 2005 on the PS2...come on...
WTF Insomniac,WHY are you guys such lightweights with the PS3 compared to all the other big names? Why?
Guerilla Games
Santa Monica
Naughty Dog
Polyphony
Team Ico
Sucker Punch
You guys are below all of them.[/QUOTE]
ok, where to start with this...
First...Upon release of R3 in September...
Insomniac- 6 PS3 games (with a 7th, Ratchet All4one in development)
Guerilla Games - 2 games
Santa Monica - 1 game
Naughty Dog - 2 games (3rd in november)
Polyphony- 1 1/2 games
Team Ico- ZERO games
Sucker Punch- 1 game (2nd scheduled for " sometime in 2011")
Insomniac was able to get a ROCK SOLID performing game (Resistance 1) ready for launch...where was GG, SM, ND, PD, Ico, SP with their games at the PS3's launch??...oh yeah still cooking, while Insomniac (3rd party dev) was carrying the console for the first 6 months of its existence...
Insomniac's Resistance games have not been the most pure beautiful games this generation, but from a technical standpoint they have been ROCK SOLID...no framerate issues, not jaggy messes, damn good lighting solutions (R2), and they have all up to this point ran at a solid 60fps...
The Ratchet games are amazing looking, obviously not "realistic" but awesome in that Pixar type sense...and again...technically rock solid...
GG - arguably the best looking FPS game still to this day...small scale, only 30fps, and not rock steady...
ND - arguably still the best looking game period...small scale, only 30fps
SM - arguably the best looking game period...great scale...variable frame rate...
PD - best looking racing game...some AA issues...ok framerate (at best) great lighting, TERRIBLE shadow effects
Ico - are you kidding me? what have these guys done other than throw together some boring as hell trailers? until they actually release a game...they don't belong in the same sentence as Insomniac
SP - good looking game, not ground breaking, jaggy fest...
these games all may look better than the Resistance games when taken at face value...but NONE of them (outside of maybe UC2 and that is half the frame rate) run as smoothly with as few issues as the Resistance games...
i actually take offense that you would try and say Team Ico are above Insomniac...dudes have not made a game since 2005 on the PS2...come on...
Likes:
TheBreezyBB