Call of Duty 5 WWII-bound

  • Posted December 8th, 2007 at 20:21 EDT by Eric Blattberg
  • 35,317 views
  • 72 Comments

Treyarch, the development team responsible for the decent Call of Duty 3, has clearly already spearheaded development on its next project, Call of Duty 5. The recently released Call of Duty 4 brought modern warfare to the table, but apparently Treyarch has eschewed the idea of emulating the awe-inspiring title. Instead, they are vying once again to create a WWII shooter, if a job ad on their website is accurate.

They're searching for a level builder who has “working experience with First-Person Shooter or Third-Person Shooter genres,” adding that “if you’re a fan of World War II shooters, then even better!”

We're fairly positive that 99% of people will not be pleased by this news - primarily due to the awesomeness that emanated from every megabyte of COD4.

We'll let you know if the listing does indeed imply what it seems to.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment

What are your thoughts?

  1. Ill_Omen17 | Ill_Omen17

    • 8:23pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    this is horrible news... well i guess its back to GRAW and rainbow six 4 me :(

  2. darkaznmonkey

    • 8:26pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    wtf why would they do that?

  3. Ljwinter | Ljwinter

    • 8:30pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    Oh well, looks like I'll be playing COD4 all the way into COD6. Bummer....

  4. Ishimaru Kaito | Kasu

    • 8:31pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    not happy about this WW2 is over so should its games

  5. zarajoe

    • 8:42pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    I don't know why Infinityward are letting this other company give the Call of Duty franchise a bad name.  COD3 was rubbish compared to  the first two games and COD4 is a masterpeice.  I wouldn't expect much from COD5

  6. tom ass

    • 8:47pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    I guess I'm part of the 1% that isn't pleased.

  7. naruto007

    • 8:55pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    f**k!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not more WWII games please!!!!

  8. Oddface | Oddface

    • 9:09pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    Bleh, what a load of rubbish.

  9. TRIPLEACE | GODSACE

    • 9:11pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    noooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  10. kudoshinchi | kudoshinchi

    • 9:22pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    COD 5 going be sucks, since its the same ppl who make COD 3

  11. Sniperwithacause | Sniperwithacause

    • 9:42pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    We have a new war, so let WWII RIP and move on

  12. gingo | gingo

    • 10:04pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    psn id: gingo... looks like i'll be looking forward to COD6 rather than this, i thought COD3 was good but not up to infinity wards standards and after playing and loving COD4 i would expect the same quality of game

  13. djrussell | djrussell89

    • 10:47pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    Am I the only one who doesnt care? Seriously - if they do a good job at it then thats all that matters. The problem is CoD was great, CoD2 was great also - but CoD3 brang nothing new to the table. Has anyone even SEEN gameplay footage of Brothers in Arms: (H)ell's Highway? It looks amazing - and simply because they have brought all new gameplay elements to the genre. If the team does the same with CoD5 as they did with CoD4 (only WW2 based) then it's gonna rock.

  14. zbamf

    • 11:34pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    @djrussell

    Obviously if they do a great job then yes we shouldn't care it's just that 99% of us feel that Treyarch will not make an awesome game but an OK one. But haven't we had enough of WWII setting in the CoD franchise? I think it was Infinity Ward who created the awesome first CoD on the PC and then we had CoD 1 & 2 on consoles. All these are awesome. Then Activision handed development to Treyarch to make CoD3 and we see a good game but the weakest of the franchie. Then Infinity develop CoD4 and make the best of the franchise. If you had Infinity and Treyarch making CoD5 seperatly simultaneously you know Infinity's version will be alot better. I jusy can't understand how Activision got Infinity to put the franchise back on top only to hand development to a team that will knock it down again? UNless there is more to it, like Infinity didn't want to make a new one?

  15. SpikeDX

    • 11:40pm GMT - December 8th, 2007

    aww that sucks

  16. AK40rtySe7en

    • 12:01am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    This is taking a giant leap backwards. First of all every COD project Treyarch has been responsible for was a disgrace to everything Infinity Ward has accomplished. Going back to WWII is even worse.

  17. Gen.Penguin

    • 12:04am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    aren't they tired of WWII?

  18. tretormenn

    • 12:28am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    O my god. What a crap. COD 3 was an horrible port for ps3. and this guys from Treyarch are pigs.

  19. MGDizzle | MGDizzle

    • 2:11am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    well i guess cod4 will be the last cod i buy

  20. BlueSteel18 | BlueSteel18

    • 2:31am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    i could care less about this game.  COD4 will keep me busy for a while, along with a ton of other games that are a lot more original rather than just another WWII FPS.

  21. richiev741

    • 2:33am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    wow  im dissapointed...

    i hope they dont have aanother ww2..

  22. ZeRoAc1dKo0L | ZeRoAciDKooL

    • 2:49am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    I'll be playing COD 4 until COD 6, unless they changed they idea of COD5 in to something not WWII cuz WWII is very much played out and dead, and it shouldnt be brought back to life.

  23. stik

    • 2:56am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    now cod is crap again >.>

  24. Limanima | Limanima

    • 3:50am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    COD as always been a WWII shooter. It's not COD if it isn't. They should have called another thing to COD4.

    This are good news for me.

  25. Syphon_Filter | Syphon_filter2

    • 4:35am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Well, if they will create COD5 based again on WWII it should  better then MEDAL OF HONOR. Because i the last 2 title of COD they were great. I personly, loved COD3 and i hope they will create within the game, new idea, more detalis and be very creative. Medal Of Honor is getting worse. I remember the old Medal Of Honor on the ps1 were better then last one, that is on the ps3.

  26. Kane | walle

    • 5:29am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    I think it's good that they do WWII. But it would be even better if they focused on other wars now. Like the Vietnam war. That would be great as a Call of Duty title! Or the cooles: WW I. Noone has ever had the guts to approach the first world war. But that would be awesome.

  27. Clarky_psu | clarky-132

    • 5:50am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Treyarch come back to ruin yet another Call of Duty game, and the good name its goting its self...

  28. Promethius30 | Tealcsg1

    • 5:57am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    thats bad

  29. tadpole3159 | faulkner8991

    • 5:58am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    yay wwII rocks. although its not true. how stupid would switching timezones be

  30. Uncool | Admodistrator

    • 6:09am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Seriously wtf, drop the WWII BS its not going to being doing anything innovative in terms of the usage of historic warfare especially one that has plagues the so many other games in the same era.

  31. Perishing_Mind

    • 7:33am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Treyarch are you trying to revive the WWII era...?

    I guess then I'll pass this one on, and wait for COD6 which is probably going to be made by Infinity Ward. These guys rock :)

  32. Babiloo | XavierHarkonnen

    • 8:06am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    f***

  33. Dave-The-Rave | Dave-The-Rave

    • 9:09am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    It would be awesome if they did WW1 (not 2..hasn't been done before) or Vietnam...or how about the civil war with like muskets and stuff !! LMAO

  34. blachaze | blachaze213

    • 9:16am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    thats crap then, i wont be buying it.

  35. Untildeath89 | willmakenewonesoon

    • 9:22am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    anyone who dont care or want this game, we like the modern warfare and the way everything looks, its easyer to make game emulating today then 60 years ago so stop this b/s, graw for me then

  36. goldenman96 | goldenman96

    • 11:19am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    this is going to suck

  37. Ninja-KiLLR | Ninja-KiLLR

    • 11:32am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    i want my modern super powerful wepeons with night vision damn it!! i  like ww2 but after the brillence for cod 4 im not sure i can go back in time

  38. A_Ninja | Arabia_Ninja

    • 11:47am GMT - December 9th, 2007

    yah >>>> horrible news .... and 99% of the people will not be pleased by this news :( ..... modern warfare was soooooo good

  39. MrGunhappy

    • 12:36pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    It's horrble that its WWII, but that really doesn't bother that much. What really bothers me is that Treyarch are making this game. WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY, there one of the worst game makers ever!!!! All of their game have sucked, expecially CoD3.

  40. Lithgow

    • 1:27pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    BOOOOO..... Bad move. But what can you expect from the development team that brought us COD3???

  41. kcgreatfox | El_Senor

    • 1:32pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    i'm so sick of WWII first person shooters. there way too many of them, and they're all essentially the same

  42. iToke

    • 1:46pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Saboteur is probably the next/last WWII game I will spend my time with...and I think with the huge success of COD4 this is just the dumbest thing I have ever heard-the WWII thing is getting way too stale, why not do something else like gulf war shlt or something - I dunno, I just think this is entirely a step back for the series, and not in a good way.

  43. kidkotic2001 | hotshot2001

    • 1:55pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    This is stupid news I hate wwII games I wont be buying this game we need modern wars with new future weapons. not wwII stuff

  44. Limanima | Limanima

    • 2:00pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Vietnam war? Who would be the bad guys? US or Nam?

  45. bnolan56 | snowy311

    • 2:05pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    OH GOD NO!! Treyarch Jesus no.. Infinity Ward please comeback to make a COD5

     

  46. reccodog | reccodog

    • 2:14pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    What...? Why in the world would they switch over to WWII? After the total sucsess thay had with the modern war theme I don't think there going to change it to WWII. It would be plane stupid if they did. But yet there are alot of stupid game dev. out there.

  47. Run and Gun | JBGJR2

    • 3:57pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    How about COD5 :Desert Warfare, in Iraq or afghanistan??  Why WWII again??

  48. Master_Man

    • 4:48pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    thats gay

  49. stopsweatinme

    • 4:49pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    Because everyone and their mom is fiending for another WWII shooter. Im not buying it. Im sick of WWII games.

  50. ChocolateBuddy | JWdarkn3ss

    • 5:05pm GMT - December 9th, 2007

    wth why would they do that? thats stupid. mordern warfare was great. WWII sucks. ive had enough of those games

Related information

Related videos

Related images

eXTReMe Tracker