- Posted April 14th, 2009 at 18:17 EDT by Steven Williamson
- 14 Comments
- PSU Review Score
- Avg. user review score:
You must be logged in to rate a game
Stormrise's major innovations are also its biggest downfalls.
- The solid online features
- How the 3D viewpoint and the field map hampers your ability to coordinate attacks effectively
- The oversensitive and over complicated control scheme
- The plodding gameplay
(continued from previous page) ...so you need to switch between units regularly and make sure you choose the right man for the job. Infiltrators, for example, have thermal vision that can detect hidden enemies, whereas Spectres have a vicious slashing motion which comes in handy when under close-quarters attack. There are also a few vehicles to control, including the machine-gun mounted Scorpion and the Prowler, which can transform into a gun platform to shoot down airborne targets. Unfortunately though, due to the over-complicated control scheme and general lack of intelligence your units show, ordering formations or cover and fire commands alongside the wealth of other orders available doesn’t always have the desired effect. As an example, two units which we sent in the same direction got stuck trying to navigate through the same gap toward the enemy. Even as early as the third level things also get incredibly tough, to a point where it just feels like the A.I. just wasn't fine-tuned before release.
The new RTS features in Stormrise, in theory, were good ideas and Creative Assembly certainly had its heart in the right place attempting to cater for the console audience with some newfangled mechanics. In truth though, Stormrise is as mediocre a game as we’ve played in this particular genre. Broken A.I., an unrefined control scheme and shoddy presentation are partly to blame, but also the decision to go 3D and move close-in on the action has actually had the reverse affect; rather than make you feel involved in the action, it actually makes you feel detached from the battlefield because it’s difficult to see exactly what’s going on. While credit deserves to be given for the solid online component, which sports matchmaking features, four-on-four skirmishes and the ability to drop in and out of games seamlessly, it's back to the drawing board for Creative Assembly, who'll no doubt learn some harsh lessons from the criticisms aimed at its first attempt at a console RTS.
- Page 1
- Page 2
- 1:28pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
awww that bad? 4.0?
- 1:33pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
I dont think the published will profit from this game. Graphics do look like a PS2 title
- 1:53pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
damn a 4.0 that stinks
- 2:23pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
1st, 2nd, 3rd ect. MY A**! When will you people grow up?!
- 2:41pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
wow thats bad.. this game stinks on the reg!
- 3:13pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
I thought this was going to be mediorcre at least
- 3:36pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
eurogamer gave it 3.0 and if u ask me the graphics are fine
- 4:17pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
holy **** a 4! damn
why does some people in this site say 1! a lot their acting like psu is giving people who say first trophies or something
- 4:18pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
this game looks stupid.
- 4:50pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
use ur copy to barricade stuff when the zombie apocalypse begins
- 5:48pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
Bag of rubbish, 4 is about right. Some nice ideas poorly executed. They should learn from this - I reckon their next RTS will be much better.
- 6:14pm EDT - April 14th, 2009
wtf is this i never even heard of it am picking this up
- 9:16am EDT - April 17th, 2009
It seems like 3/5 games the PSU rates turns out to be bad... start reviewing some decent GAMES!!!
This will permanently ban this user and delete all associated comments. This action is irreversible, are you SURE you want to do this?!