Developer: IO Interactive
Publisher: Eidos Interactive
Genre: Shooter
Sub-Genre: Third Person
Release Date: Nov 14th, 2007
Additonal Info: Also available on Xbox 360 a...
Developer: Insomniac Games
Publisher: SCEA
Genre: Shooter
Sub-Genre: First Person Horror
Release Date: Nov 17th, 2006
Additonal Info: Only on PS3
Developer: Black Box
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Genre: N/A
Sub-Genre: N/A
Release Date: February 18th, 2008
Additonal Info: Also available on Xbox 360, ...
(continued from previous page) ...experience is pretty dull to be honest and you’re not going to invest a lot of time into it like you may other online games.
Overall, Turok takes you deep into a jungle atmosphere with tall grass, plenty of dinosaurs, a slew of bad guys, but this amalgamation ultimately offers nothing more than an average gameplay experience. We suggest the game may provide some entertainment on rental-only basis, or solely for Turok enthusiasts.

Turok Awakening Giants Trailer
Turok
Turok
Turok
really? a 7.0...idk i think thats a bit too high
no think a 7.0 is about right from what i experienced on the demo
Devil may cry 4 gets a 8, and this a 7? In my opinion and also according to the average user ratings for each one of your reviews, there should be a much larger gap inbetween...
man. and i was really looking forward to this title...
not dat gre8 of a game i didnt even play da demo n i know it
This game gives me nausea.
I think a 7 is about right- it was not impressive at all very BLAHHH! Nothing has even comeclose to COD4 for me- DAMN, I love that game!!I cant get enough.
Enacku, user ratings are skewed big time by people who give games they hate automatic 1's and 0's and games they automatically feel should be amazing 10's and 9's... Also, user ratings may be done by people who haven't even played the game they're rating. The majority of my review scores are pretty "just" in terms of averages on what the game is receiving in general.
Sounds good DaveW, just giving my 2 cents
Yeah, I understand your opinion and respect it. Was just giving insight as to why the gap is so large between user rating/review rating. (This doesn't apply to multiplat sites due to fans of each console cancelling the other out in ridiculous votes, lol)
I bought this game on day one and actually really enjoy it.
you all suck.. turk takes you to a messed up planet and you get attacked by crazy dino's and theres galloons of bloood sweeet grafix and amazing AI....
w.e i love it =D
no game should tell you how many shots you have left. make people count them like real people do
I think turok is much better thank DMC4 to be honest. Clearly you haven't played Turok on insane or played the large capture the flag matches. It isn't old at all. You can't say shooters get repetitive. Look at Resistance and look at COD4 and R6:Vegas? Are they repetitive? No, mostly because you think they are more fun than this. Nevertheless all shooters are redundant so stop pointing it out.
I only played the demo, but I found it to be really quite poor. From what I experienced, I'd probably say 6/10, but like I said, I only played the demo.
I guess this game ended up being a filler for fps later on in the end. But then again not many people liked the demo as much because it seems like your standard fps with the exception of some of the features like the universal usage of the knife.
this is totally unrelated but how do i get an image in the (image not available) box left of this message???
Only 7.0? I had good expectations for this game.
If you ask me, the pros should all be cons for this game. Half-decent dialogue is bad. Stealth kills will never keep anyone playing a game IMO. If that was the case then SOFP should have flown off the shelves. I don't think a 7 is good for this game. Playing the demo, I'd give it a 5 at best, probably a 4. Not because I hate the game, but because the game just sucks. Heck make it a 3
A 3???? Wow you figured out what they spent on this game!!!!
it was a good game but what ruined it for me was the terrible checkpoint system it had........... to damn frustrating