.

Resident Evil 6 replaces fear with tension; for the best

  • Posted October 9th, 2012 at 16:07 EDT by Timothy Nunes
  • 9 Comments

It's no longer important why Capcom decided to change its fourth installment to the Resident Evil franchise, but it's difficult to determine where those changes will ultimately take the series.  The fifth title then enhanced those gameplay changes in an attempt to “modernize” it further. However, the survival-horror aspects had all but disappeared from their original intent. Capcom may now be onto something with Resident Evil 6 by delivering an experience that re-kindles some of those old feelings from the past titles: tension.

Surely, tension can’t replace the aspect of fear, but fear is much harder to create in modern gaming. Older games were naturally scarier, because the control schemes and hardware were limiting. Tank controls kept players from having versatility, which created a tension all its own. And on top of that, aiming was a joke, and ammunition was almost nowhere to be found. Nowadays, with the rapid pace of life, it’s less worth a gamer’s while to pick up a new title that features the same core game experience as those old games; games have to be immersive, they have to be detailed, and they have to be smooth. Controls fall into this, and newer hardware allows for more and more abilities for players to use. Thus, the older genres look and feel obsolete. Still, as a fan of other older titles, it’d be swell to play a modern game that made me feel the same as the older games did.

This is where Resident Evil 6 is succeeding. Well, it’s almost succeeding. There are points in the game where tension is high, ranging from shooting at zombies while crawling through waist-high tunnels or determining if dead zombies are really dead in common hallways. Many scenes with the Ustanak were delivered in a very tense way, which initially showed the natural limitations of the controls to the situation at hand. The balance is almost there, and another installment, with the help of an improved engine (hint hint, Capcom), could create the perfect blend of the new and old Resident Evil experiences.

Tension needs to become the equivalent to what fear used to mean to this franchise. What I mean is that tension is so much more motivating for gamers, since it on its own is a motivator to keep moving through a game, and it can even help gamers ease through, or even make them oblivious to, weak script work. This can, and should, lead the modernization of the Resident Evil series to simulate what the older games had by driving up the tension to push the gamer to feel the limitations of the present control schemes.

Now, this isn’t automatic right now. RE6 still has its modern-day issues, like weak scripting here and there, repetitive monsters, and inconsistencies in ambiance, but it’s still a good game, in terms of today’s standards. Hell, even if this game came out with a title that veered away from “Resident Evil” entirely, it would’ve probably been more accepted. What really throws it off are its hefty action sequences and open areas, which take away from the challenge and mystery of the game, making it less and less tense. On the other hand, new IPs aren’t as successful as good sequels, so Capcom probably did the right thing.

The whole point is that it’s hard to replenish the heart and soul of the games of old when the standards of today are moving so quickly. The older hardware was simpler than today’s, which allowed developers to fully grasp the limitations and bottleneck them into an experience that scared the living hell out of us. Present-day hardware, however, is taking a fair while to fully comprehend, but Capcom is on its way to pushing the experience in Resident Evil to a modern-day likeness to what we had in our younger years. It still needs a lot of work, and the plot and overall feel of the game must be consistent before it can succeed its former namesake. Right now, it's a smooth gameplay experience with moments of successful tension, but it gives us a potential hope that Capcom can make it even better.

related articles

Related Content

Comments

  1. Arkbennett

    • 10:56pm EDT - October 9th, 2012

    Thank you for this article.
    I orginally bought the Anthalogy pack because I thought it was a great deal, (Still disappointed that it wasn't physical media, Capcom) I had low expectations for 6.
    Upon playing it, I found that it was quite good. I feel like it isn't getting the credit it deserves. Granted I wish it stayed in development for another 6 months for some polish.
    I'm just glad someone with a voice is defending it.

  2. Tim Nunes

    • 11:43pm EDT - October 9th, 2012

    Thank you, Arkbennett. I'm glad to see that other gamers can see some good in RE6. I was introduced to the franchise with RE4, so the gameplay style is pretty influencial to me. RE6 has a lot of room to grow, but I feel like it's a big step in the right direction after RE5.

  3. Gameoholic007 | Demented007

    • 12:46am EDT - October 10th, 2012

    No thanks, I'll pass, unless they brought RE back to its roots.

    @2- You were introduced to the franchise with 4? Ouch!! RE4 was one of the worst RE's released.

    Last RE I bought was RE4. After I saw how Capcom destroyed that game, I never supported the RE franchise again.......and it's stayin that way unless they start caring about their fanbase, and change their tune. 

  4. Tim Nunes

    • 2:09am EDT - October 10th, 2012

    I can't agree, because the tank controls were always such a roadblock that I never cared for the games because of them. I understand the point of them, but I was too young to really care enough for it. As unfortunate as that may be, RE4 is still my favorite RE title out of what I've experienced.

  5. Windwalker

    • 4:12am EDT - October 10th, 2012

     I will forever cheerish (and shake my fist) at the memorable scares from the old RE games. 'Modern' RE may not have those same feelings of dread, isolation and horror... but dammit I still enjoy 'em. 

    Still holding out for a Jill/Barry game. C'mon Capcom, don't leave me hanging here.

  6. Tim Nunes

    • 10:02am EDT - October 10th, 2012

    @5 I can respect that. That's much like my experiences with MGS: the newer ones weren't as complicated and strange as the first one, but they were still wonderful. Granted, the improvements for MGS were much, much better and more gradual than they were for RE, so it's not exactly fair to compare them, but I still reminisce about those first boss fights; MGS4 did a superb job at recalling all of those fights, btw.

  7. thesuperfunk

    • 2:08pm EDT - October 10th, 2012

    ... Or they could just do what everyone wants and do a proper old-school remake of RE2

  8. TreKKiker | Helm_of_Darkness

    • 9:44pm EDT - October 10th, 2012

    @7 You think EVERYONE wants that?

  9. CloudStrife37 | CloudStrife37

    • 2:32pm EDT - October 11th, 2012

    I'd rather them HD-ify 2 than remake it. Put the new voice actors in, re-do the pre-rendered backgrounds and all the character models. Don't change the camera angles, storyline, events, etc. Maybe mix up the puzzles so I can't breeze through it in an hour, though,

Comment

What are your thoughts?

This will permanently ban this user and delete all associated comments. This action is irreversible, are you SURE you want to do this?!

Share With Your Friends!

The Facebook Platform

Connect to PSU's social reader to share articles and see what your friends are reading. [ More info ]

Related information

  • Related game: Resident Evil 6

    Release date (US):
    October 2nd, 2012
    Developer:
    Capcom
    Genre:
    Action - Horror
    Rank:
    552 of 2,374 Games
    Up 486 places (in last 7 days)

Related videos

Related images

RSS feed

Forum discussions

More

5,978,278 Posts | 280,642 members