Crytek: CryEngine 3 "will run slightly better" on PS3

  • Posted March 26th, 2009 at 19:47 EDT by Eric Blattberg
  • 13,706 views
  • 56 Comments

In an interview with IGN, Crytek President and CEO Cevat Yerli stated that CryEngine 3 "will run slightly better" on the PlayStation 3. The difference may be negligible to gamers themselves, however, as Yerli also remarked that "it'll look and feel probably the same" on both platforms.

"The CE3 runs currently at more or less the same quality bar," Yerli asserted. "I say more or less because the engine still optimizes itself to power of the platforms' intrinsics. So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently."

Yerli seemed a bit unsure of himself, but it's nice to know that the engine will, at the very least, run equally well on both platforms.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment

What are your thoughts?

  1. ilovemylambo

    • 7:48pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

     first and that goes to show u xbox that ps3 pwnssssssssss

  2. hatrix

    • 7:55pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    Well, we still can't exactly say the PS3 is "a crap ton" more powerful or anything. After all, how many games have Crytek done on a console :P

  3. mikeghtmare

    • 8:24pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    Take that MS... LOL, I'm just kidding; in the end it comes down to how the developers use it.

  4. Sryche22

    • 8:25pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

     yeah but the thing is is that with the bluray drive, developers will be able to fully utilize this graphics engine to the fullest capability and really come out with some crazy immersive games in the next few years....the 360 chumps are still stuck with dvd's and all that crappy compression that comes with it

  5. Crispay

    • 8:29pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

     what about OnLIVE? THAT SYSTEM HAS CRYSIS ON IT, WILL IT HAVE THE NEXT GAME MADE BY CRYTECH?

  6. jamesobachand

    • 8:35pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    or better on the PS3

  7. Free_Agent

    • 8:45pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    Yeah, We'll just have to wait and see. It's all how developers use what they've got. Both consoles are on equal footing as far as raw power goes, when you consider the different gpu/cpu setups they both use, both have their advantages/disadvantages. The 360 has a slight advantage with it's gpu, and the PS3 has a slight advantage with its cpu. If developers can independantly make work of each strenghth, the end result should be a product that's equal on both platforms.

  8. Oatmeal

    • 9:08pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    psu whats up with the advertisements in the article now

  9. Daz2399

    • 9:41pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    All this means is its another bland engine. It wil not fully utilize the PS3. That said, it looks pretty good so we will see what we get with it.

  10. terminator12259

    • 9:46pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    well thats is a shocker. but seriously who didnt know that the PS3 is more powerful already

  11. SonyJunkie

    • 9:54pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

     Well thats good. We all know the 360 version will look really good and if the PS3 can outperform that slightly, we know the PS3 version will be just as good and not some skimpy port.

  12. r_e_f_l_e_x

    • 10:08pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    STOP SAYiNG FIRST YOU DUMB 12 YEAR OLD PIECES OF @#$% NOBODY GIVES A !*^&   !!!!!!!!!     GOD PSU< sTOP THE MADNESS PLEASE!  

    "slightly better"?  stop acting like you didnt make them run equally on purpose.

  13. supamariobrotha

    • 10:18pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    meh

  14. Eric2929

    • 10:37pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    @8 - We're truly sorry, but running a website is expensive and the economy is not so hot right now. I don't like it either, but it's necessary.

  15. ForTheSteel

    • 10:49pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

     interesting. from the video it looked to me like the 360 version looked better. it was especially evident in the lighting, shadows, and shaders. 

  16. ScandalO0

    • 10:51pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    I likes the way he put i.

  17. Mo-green28

    • 11:26pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    i'll believe it when i see it. We always get a developer talking about a game or program will run equal or better on our beloved PS3... But then we find out the hard way they lied

  18. zombieking36

    • 11:46pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    Dang... I like this, the CryEngine has better graphics then what the Unreal Engine can do...

  19. plslc

    • 11:50pm GMT - March 26th, 2009

    I think OnLive will run as good or better than PS3 or 360. CE3 will be awesome, but soon it wont matter what system its on, because next-gen will be a 1 console gaming, thanks to OnLive!!! They just need to work on the latency, but as far as system power, it cant be beat... so cryengine 3 will be easy for OnLive servers to handle, since they wont have to depend on a single home console with limited processing power. Now dont get me wrong, I own both 360 and PS3, and they're good, but wouldnt you like to play Killzone 3 and Gears of War 3 on 1 system? OnLive is the next big thing...Finally, CRYSIS 2 on a 50 inch plasma!!!

  20. Loan

    • 12:35am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    WOAH thats gotta hurt sorry

  21. jaybiv

    • 12:48am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Sounds like he caught himself before he got on Billy G's bad side.

  22. hellghan666

    • 1:10am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    great..... but i prefer the engine of kill zone 2  :)

  23. Bigdoggy

    • 1:41am GMT - March 27th, 2009

  24. cb_32

    • 2:19am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    i really hope they make a great FPS.

     

    FAR CRY 2 was really MEH

  25. radgamer420

    • 2:21am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    We have heard developers say this kind of thing before and it turned out to be a load of bs. Either way judging from the videos I've seen this engine looks great on both consoles.

  26. Sryche22

    • 2:36am GMT - March 27th, 2009

     @ 19...hold up yo.....we don't even know what the fee is going to be for OnLive....if it's even $25.00 a month that's $300.00 a year...it's like buying a new console every year....so it may not even be a cost effective product, even if it does look cool as heck

  27. Chiem

    • 3:23am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Yay!

     

    27th o/

  28. mcav

    • 4:14am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    What I got from this was "Damn, we'll have to admit it's better on PS3, but we don't want to say by how much, because then we'll lose 360 software sales".

     

    Also why are people talking about how OnLive will run this?  Seriously, you'd be as well speculating about the Playstation 9000 (or over 9000)

     

     

  29. Arda82

    • 4:16am GMT - March 27th, 2009

  30. arfi-gorgona-O

    • 5:03am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    At leat with the engines current state the PS3 version looks and plays better.All you need to do is watch the HD comparisson video.The PS3 version is more crisp and it has less slowdowns and better effects (just look the explosion effects in the wall and you will see..)

  31. rutea7

    • 5:57am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    "... "will run slightly better" on PS3"

    how politically correct of them, lol

    seriously, finally an engine that can make the ps3 shines like it deserves

  32. ptmww3

    • 6:02am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    ok....let's see it all after they make a game on CE3. I never belive big talks and...... like if it run better on ps3 cuz i got a ps3 haha

  33. sicstar

    • 7:00am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    @4   - yes the 360 uses dvd (i think 9gb) and blue ray has 50gb but as long as the games are released on both platforms, the ps3 game is going to be pulled down to 360s standards.

  34. stennex

    • 7:01am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Wait a minute did we not witness KZ2. It would be in Cryteks best interest to make sure that their engine looks better than KZ2s or else it would be a waste. PS3 is really powerful.

    PSN ID:stennex.

  35. dsluckay

    • 7:46am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    ooooohhhhh PS3!ooooooohhhhh!

  36. masonmcglasson

    • 7:53am GMT - March 27th, 2009

     The thing about this engine, it's multiplatform.  It is designed to run on both systems well, with maybe PS3 being slightly better.  However if this engine was developed only for the PS3, I'm sure we would see a much better engine.  As this is a multiplatform engine it will not utilize the PS3 to it's fullest like Killzone 2, Uncharted, MGS4, etc.

  37. Strudel

    • 8:27am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Wow, all he's saying is that the PS3 lends itself to how cryengine 3 works.

  38. Wolf873

    • 8:30am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Actually that statement from the dev makes sense now, when I observed the video, I could see some textures pop-in (hope that's the righ term) in 360 video (speficially trees). Before I thought it was the video, and Im still not leaving out that possibility, however as the man himself said, difference is minimal at best.

  39. arfi-gorgona-O

    • 8:56am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Its not that minimal actually...cause the 360 at least from the video,has slower frame rate very visible in the fire section,more pop ins,actually i don't remember seen pop ins on the PS3 footage..a lot blurry in textures very visible on the sea section,and the effects (explosion) aren't that good as the Ps3 version.Are all these minimal?

  40. markwesker

    • 9:49am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    360 has unreal engine and  ps3 has CryEngine....just another blow to the xbots and shows ps3 is more powerful.

     

    got yellow light of death...gutted  :(

  41. Wolf873

    • 9:50am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    @39 I only noticed tree texture pop-ins. And again, I won't leave out the fact that some framerate issues such as those you mentioned might be due to the video itself. I never mentioned any pop-ins in PS3, but now that you mention it, I did notice some in trees, but it was less than 360 though. In any case, I am not a 360 nor PS3 fanboy if you think I'm trying to say one version is better over the other, and for your assurance I only have PS3 for a console. My statement was based on what I just said basically, so I said minimal.

  42. arfi-gorgona-O

    • 9:54am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Np man i never implyed it,i just pointed out what i saw in the video.

  43. Brokentusk81

    • 10:38am GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Graphics on the two consoles might be practically the same right now, but as we all know, developers are continually learning how  to maximize the processing power of the PS3, and estimates are that the PS3 is going to blow the xbox 360 away in graphics by 2013/2014. So its really only a matter of time.

  44. JoshSimmo

    • 12:14pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

    aslong as it runs at atleast 30 fps i'd buy the game 

  45. killahki

    • 12:45pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Sounds like CryEng 3 for PS3, and Unreal E for XB360!!

  46. juanvaldez

    • 12:54pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Im wonder if they are saying slightly, so that they dont offend M$. I hope this helps some lower end devs get going on the ps3

  47. amk111

    • 1:28pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

     who cares. it  is used to create s**** games anyway.

  48. subwaydesign

    • 2:43pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

    just diss this engine and start using the killzone 2 one.

    leave cryengine only for jungle games. the buildings in the trailer look as bad as those in ninja gaiden sigma (which i own, and love... but graphics are 5 or 6/10)

  49. Limanima

    • 3:44pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Actually in the PS3 vs XBox comparison video I noticed some diferences for the better in the PS3 version. Glad to know it wasn't my imagination working.

  50. Playstation_3

    • 7:56pm GMT - March 27th, 2009

    Crytek: CryEngine 3 "will run slightly better" on PS3

    But will run alot better on PC.

Related information

eXTReMe Tracker